Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Goldies Shadow  (Read 617 times)

maddogmurph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 694
    • Maddog's Photography
Goldies Shadow
« on: May 10, 2017, 10:43:22 PM »

Daily Bay'ly
Logged
Maddog - Apologetically critical

Calumet // Tachihara // Schneider 90mm, 210mm // 10" // FUJIFILM X-T1 // 10-24mm, 18-55mm, F55-200mm, 35mm, 60mm // Driod POS // Pentax WG3 // Sony RX100 // Nikon D810 // 24mm F1.4, 50mm F1.4, 70-200mm F4

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4106
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2017, 04:32:02 AM »

Nice light and composition. I would prefer to see the bridge in focus.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8747
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2017, 06:52:31 AM »

Nice light and composition. I would prefer to see the bridge in focus.

Is it out of focus or is it the fog that makes it look OOF? I quite like it despite the OOF bridge structure.
Logged
Francois

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4106
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2017, 06:54:31 AM »

Is it out of focus or is it the fog that makes it look OOF? I quite like it despite the OOF bridge structure.

When I zoom in it looks OOF to me. But it is a minor nit.

thierrylegros396

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1481
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2017, 02:04:08 AM »

Is it out of focus or is it the fog that makes it look OOF? I quite like it despite the OOF bridge structure.

+1

Thierry
Logged

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2231
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2017, 04:11:25 PM »

I also like it. Having to choose where to place focus, I'd go for the clouds too.

-Dave-
Logged

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2772
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2017, 09:10:25 AM »

From that distance, at f/11 or greater I would think all would be in focus.
Logged
What! Me Worry?

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2231
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2017, 03:08:20 PM »

Interesting: EXIF data shows 200mm, f/20 and 1/400 sec. Could be we're seeing some diffraction, or a little jitter.

Snoop mode off.  ;D

-Dave-
Logged

maddogmurph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 694
    • Maddog's Photography
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2017, 08:05:13 PM »

Interesting: EXIF data shows 200mm, f/20 and 1/400 sec. Could be we're seeing some diffraction, or a little jitter.

Snoop mode off.  ;D

-Dave-

Maybe you're talking about the bottom of the screen where I did a pretty lame job of removing a telephone wire?
Logged
Maddog - Apologetically critical

Calumet // Tachihara // Schneider 90mm, 210mm // 10" // FUJIFILM X-T1 // 10-24mm, 18-55mm, F55-200mm, 35mm, 60mm // Driod POS // Pentax WG3 // Sony RX100 // Nikon D810 // 24mm F1.4, 50mm F1.4, 70-200mm F4

opgr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1500
Re: Goldies Shadow
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2017, 02:47:27 AM »

Maybe you're talking about the bottom of the screen where I did a pretty lame job of removing a telephone wire?

No, the bridge and bridgestays are blurred. It looks like camerashake parallel to the bridgestays on the right. As a consequence the structure to the right looks sharper than to the left.
Logged
Regards,
Oscar
Pages: [1]   Go Up