Thanks everyone for the replies. After considerable additional reading and watching, I
think it's becoming clearer. So it seems:
* Color working spaces do not (with minor / emerging exceptions--maybe a new V4 profile for sRGB?!) contain in their profile files (the .icc or .icm) the information with which to convert from one to another except with relative colorimetric rendering intent. Andrew Rodney discusses this at about 0:37:05 of his video at
http://digitaldog.net/files/PhotoshopColorSettings.mp4.
* Jack Hogan's Adobe forum link (
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1083949) was quite informative, contains some other helpful links, and basically confirms that Adobe products (well, I assume Lightroom and Photoshop, not sure what color management facilities Elements has) use relative colorimetric rendering intent to map edited raw data into the chosen color space when exporting to a TIFF or JPEG.
* And because very, very few if any colors that our typical cameras can capture are outside of ProPhoto RGB, a safe option from either Lightroom or Optics Pro is to export the edited raw data to a 16-bit TIFF in ProPhoto RGB, and then convert that TIFF to the desired ultimate color space / profile with software that lets you choose the rendering intent
at least where the destination profile actually gives you options, i.e., typically printer+paper profiles but typically not working space profiles.
But all of that, even if correct, doesn't resolve the issue, and this thread appears to contain at least one error above: "Raw converters are outputting to idealized RGB working colorspaces, i.e. sRGB, aRGB, ProPhotoRGB."
Not necessarily! In fact, maybe not even desirably. Both Lightroom and Optics Pro are (or at least appear to be) perfectly willing to let you export edited raw data into a TIFF or JPEG in a printer profile color space instead of a working color space. I have actually done this more than once with Optics Pro. Attached is a screen capture of Lightroom set to do it. In such circumstances, I ought to be able to choose the rendering intent. Why would I want to? Usually because I edit my photos on a computer that is not conveniently connected to a Canon Pro-100 on which I sometimes print them. Why can't I just export from Lightroom or Optics Pro a ready-to-print JPEG, and then e-mail or otherwise transmit it to another computer, which shares a network with the Pro-100?
And on a broader level / to expand the inquiry: why don't the IEC (for sRGB), Adobe (for Adobe RGB 1998), the ICC or Kodak(!) (I think, for ProPhoto RGB), etc. create bigger and better profile files that contain the information to allow us to use perceptual and/or other rendering intents? It seems that even (especially?) when converting among working space profiles, we might well want to / ought to get the choice of whether to truncate out-of-gamut color or compress all colors from the wider gamut to fit into the smaller one, as an aesthetic choice specific to the photo we're processing. I think Jim was saying that above, and it certainly strikes me as true (although I'm quite the novice with this stuff).
Again, many thanks!