Dee's Restaurant

[chuckn]

Dee's Restaurant sign. Comments....

Chuck

[Eric Myrvaagnes]

I like.

[francois]

I like it too... Processing transforms it into a timeless image.

[graeme]

I like it too... Processing transforms it into a timeless image.

+1

[JNB_Rare]

I don't know if Dee's might possibly be/have been a local chain, but it certainly juxtaposes the independent restaurants of old against the ubiquitous, international fast-food joints of the present. As others have commented, the processing really works for the image.

[RSL]

Sorry, Chuck, but I just don't get it. There's a Dee's restaurant sign with an Arby's on the other side of the street. Dee's presumably is behind us. Maybe you were trying to do a Friedlander, but Lee's stuff usually had a point. I guess I'm just missing the point in this one.

[chuckn]

Sorry, Chuck, but I just don't get it. There's a Dee's restaurant sign with an Arby's on the other side of the street. Dee's presumably is behind us. Maybe you were trying to do a Friedlander, but Lee's stuff usually had a point. I guess I'm just missing the point in this one.

Russ, no point or statement to be made. Just an interesting urban landscape that caught my eye.

Chuck

[Telecaster]

What I take from this pic is the possibility that Dee's may no longer exist aside from the sign.

-Dave-

[Eric Myrvaagnes]

The fact that Dee's only shows the sign while Arby's shows its building provides the desired ambiguity, IMHO.

[BobDavid]

Sorry, I don't "see it" either. I think Russ's critique is on point.

[BAB]

Can you reshoot it so Dees is right of the building the Dees sign is a shape on a shape very distracting. I would move to the left to separate the objects or cross the street and shoot from the other side.

[Telecaster]

Yeah, I'd go back and do some more "takes."

-Dave-