Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 331   Go Down

Author Topic: Trump II  (Read 916190 times)

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3880 on: June 27, 2017, 12:46:13 am »

Majority Of Global Poll Respondents Find Trump Arrogant, Dangerous



Quote
A new poll from the Pew Research Center has found that Donald Trump's presidency is strongly and negatively impacting how the rest of the world views the United States.

At the end of Barack Obama's term, 64 percent of global respondents said they were confident in the U.S. president, compared to 22 percent now. Seventy-four percent of those surveyed said they have no confidence in Trump.

Compared to the final years of Obama's presidency, Trump received higher ratings in just two of the 37 countries surveyed – Russia and Israel.

The Trump administration is aiming to improve relations with Russia. The president has also expressed a desire to help mediate a peace deal between the Israelis and Palestinians, while his policies have also appeared to embolden settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank.

"The sharp decline in how much global publics trust the U.S. president on the world stage is especially pronounced among some of America's closest allies in Europe and Asia, as well as neighboring Mexico and Canada," the report states.

The negative perceptions of the U.S. president appear to be impacting U.S. favorability ratings in general. Sixty-four percent of those surveyed had favorable views of the U.S. at the end of the Obama presidency, compared to 49 percent now.



Quote
Arrogant, intolerant and dangerous — these are all traits that a sizeable majority of global respondents said describe the U.S. president. On the other hand, 55 percent see him as a strong leader, while 39 percent say that he is charismatic.

Only about one in four people stated that they found Trump "well-qualified to be president" and "caring about ordinary people."

The survey asked about five of the Trump administration's signature policy proposals — withdrawing from the Iran deal, restricting travelers from some Muslim-majority countries, withdrawing from climate change and trade agreements, and building a wall along the border with Mexico. It found that all of these positions are unpopular globally.

It's worth noting that Americans as a people remain popular, and "a median of 58% say they have a favorable impression of Americans." Global respondents also tend to like U.S. popular culture, such as television and music, by a wide margin.

#MAGA Make the world hate the USA....
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3881 on: June 27, 2017, 12:55:39 am »

Well, I'm glad this issue is finally put to bed!!!

Park Service behaved appropriately regarding Trump crowd reports, watchdog finds


One day after the inauguration, White House press secretary Sean Spicer lambasted reporters in the briefing room and said, falsely, that Trump’s inaugural had drawn
the “largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period.” | AP Photo


Quote
The feud between the National Park Service and the Trump White House appeared to ease on Monday after a watchdog found that NPS officials did not alter inauguration crowd size estimates and that public affairs officials did not leak information about a phone call between President Donald Trump and the agency’s acting director.

The NPS was wrapped up in the controversy that overwhelmed the first days of Trump’s administration after the president and his aides claimed record crowds at his inauguration and railed against those who cast doubt on the claim.

One day after the inauguration, White House press secretary Sean Spicer lambasted reporters in the briefing room and said, falsely, that Trump’s inaugural had drawn the “largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period.”

The Park Service became the target of Trump’s ire after its Twitter account retweeted side-by-side images that appeared to show a paltry crowd for Trump’s inauguration compared to former President Barack Obama.

The feud deepened when reports leaked of a phone call Trump placed the day after the inauguration to Acting NPS Director Michael Reynolds in which the president allegedly ordered the agency to produce images to help prove his claims of crowd size.

But a report from the Department of the Interior Inspector General released on Monday found that NPS employees did not alter crowd size records and the NPS public affairs officials did not leak information to the press about the phone call.

The report does not make clear who requested the investigation, which was initiated in February.

Hum, I wonder who would care so much that they demanded an investigation?

T?

(I get a kick out of the fact the Trumpster has taken to referring to himself as 'T' on Twitter...does it stand for Trump or Twit?)
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3882 on: June 27, 2017, 01:09:37 am »

Hum, I'll bet the Trumpster won't be happy that overrated Alec Baldwin will be back on the overrated Saturday Night Live Fall season :~)

'SNL': Alec Baldwin will return as Donald Trump in season 43



Quote
Alec Baldwin, you’re not fired.

After previously saying he wouldn’t keep portraying Donald Trump for “much longer,” the 30 Rock alum has now declared he will be back in the wig and suit for season 43 of Saturday Night Live.

“Yeah, we’re going to fit that in,” he told CNN. “I think people have enjoyed it.” According to CNN, Baldwin’s other commitments will mean a little less of his Trump impersonation, with fans getting “a couple celery sticks” instead of a “whole meal.”

Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3883 on: June 27, 2017, 01:20:53 am »

Prime minister Modi could lecture Trump on climate change — India is leapfrogging the US on renewables



Quote
India's prime minister Narendra Modi is meeting with President Donald Trump on Monday, and the agenda could include climate change as the two prepare for the G-20 Summit in July.

In the wake of Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, Modi might have a thing or two to lecture the American president about. India is leapfrogging the US with ambitious renewable energy goals — and it's achieving them.

Following the US' departure from the Paris accord, countries like India, China, and the EU have "stepped up to fill the void the US left behind" John Coequyt, the Sierra Club's global climate policy director, told Business Insider on Monday.

India wants to get nearly 60% of its energy from non-fossil fuel sources by 2027, and the country is on track to exceed the goals it set in its commitment to the Paris deal.

"India in particular has made huge progress in terms of not only meeting but actually being on track to exceed its Paris commitments," Coequyt said, "and as the cost of solar energy and other renewables continues to fall globally, we're only going to see that trend accelerate."

So how did India, infamous for its sometimes choking pollution in major cities, cut back its emissions faster than anyone predicted? One word: coal.

India has been unabashedly shutting down its coal plants. For example, The Independent reported last week that Coal India, the world's largest coal company that's responsible for 82% of India's coal, announced it was closing 37 mines due to the economic non-viability of the fossil fuel. Indian economic coal imports are falling, and Bloomberg reported the India's energy minister announced the government wants to do-away with coal imports entirely.

Dropping coal isn't a new phenomenon in India. From July 2015 to July 2016, India's "coal plant pipeline" fell by 40 gigawatts, according to Coal Swarm. And under its draft National Electricity Plan from December 2016, the country isn't planning on building any new coal power plants.

By virtue of adopting renewables with such gusto, about 25,000 remote villages in India could never use fossil fuels. They'll sail right past coal and start using solar, hydropower, and biomass as their first sources of electricity.

Yeah, meanwhile Trump is claiming that he's gonna put coal miners back to work! Just about the time everybody is moving on from using coal.

#MAGA Step back in time to the 1890's!
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3884 on: June 27, 2017, 01:34:52 am »

Jeff,  Did I miss your post on the travel ban since SCOTUS ruled?  And Gorsuch sided with the conservatives on the court.   And Obama knew from the beginning that Putin ordered interference but Trump didn't collude.  How does it feel to keep winning?

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3885 on: June 27, 2017, 01:35:55 am »

Typical, claiming credit for something somebody already did...

Trump Promotes a U.S. Gas Trade With India That Already Exists


Cheniere Energy Inc.’s Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas terminal in Louisiana started shipping in Feb 2016

Quote
In promoting trade with India, President Donald Trump suggested Monday that the U.S. is on the verge of signing long-term agreements to send natural gas to the Asian country.

There’s just one thing: India already has long-term agreements for U.S. gas. And it’s received at least seven cargoes of it since the U.S. started liquefying its shale gas and sending it overseas last year, according to ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg.


After a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Trump said the U.S. will sign long-term contracts to supply India with American gas, adding that it’s “trying to get the price up a little bit” first. Meanwhile, Indian companies have already secured agreements for supplies from Cheniere Energy Inc.’s Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas terminal in Louisiana; Dominion Energy Inc.’s planned Cove Point LNG plant in Maryland; and Sempra Energy’s Cameron LNG project in Louisiana, company filings show.

At this point, such long-term gas contracts between the U.S. and India are “not new,” said Anastacia Dialynas, an energy analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance. "We’ve already had 24 billion cubic feet since we started exporting last year and that will likely increase. The biggest impact this could have is if it signals a new contract being signed."

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on already-existing gas contracts with India.
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3886 on: June 27, 2017, 01:39:07 am »

Jeff,  Did I miss your post on the travel ban since SCOTUS ruled?

Well, you were posting about it enough, no need for me to weigh in...meanwhile other stuff happened today that I though you might need to know. I like the poll about who would give up alcohol to get Trump impeached! What was YOUR favorite piece of news from Monday? Tuesday brings a whole new crop of news stories :~)

#NEVERADULLMOMENT
Logged

Farmer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2848
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3887 on: June 27, 2017, 04:06:01 am »

SCOTUS has already ruled 9-0 that the president has the right to exclude aliens.  So he can't lose on that.

No, they didn't.

As you quoted:

and the Executive’s authority to do so, are undoubtedly at their peak when there is no tie between the foreign national and the United States.viating obvious hardship to anyone else...

That doesn't say he has an absolute right to do so.  It says the authority is at its "peak" - it's strongest.  It doesn't exclude the possibility that such an order might be invalid in some circumstances.  It's important to differentiate between authority and a right in this case.  Authority can be withdrawn far easier than can a right.

I don't think anyone (sane) believes that he doesn't have the authority to exclude aliens, or that doing so to those with no ties to the US would have the least restrictions, but the question that arises is the definition of a tie.  As the SCotUS also said it's a question of injury to the rights of others that comes into play and again, that's why it's key not to call the Executive's authority a right.  The rights of others cannot be abridged by virtue of an authority that does not carry the same level of right (i.e. constitutional).

If Trump's smart (and he's not, but sometimes he know when to leave well enough alone such as the law suits he dropped before taking office), he'll do the review, tighten up the checks, and then move on and hope the SCotUS decides there's no longer anything to decide (because if they decide and limit his authority, then it's done - testing things in court that can go against you when you really don't have anything to gain is silly).

Again, I don't think anyone feels that more robust or thorough checks on people coming from potentially dangerous regions is a problem.  The problem is that he didn't include the place all the 9/11 terrorists came from (instead he sold them billions of dollars in arms), and the language and scope of his order was inept.  Had he been more reasonable and sensible, he could have easily worked on increasing the vetting and implementing stronger restrictions and actually achieved something, instead of attempting to grandstand and show who was boss and falling flat on his face.
Logged
Phil Brown

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3888 on: June 27, 2017, 10:41:27 am »

No, they didn't.

As you quoted:

That doesn't say he has an absolute right to do so.  It says the authority is at its "peak" - it's strongest.  It doesn't exclude the possibility that such an order might be invalid in some circumstances.  It's important to differentiate between authority and a right in this case.  Authority can be withdrawn far easier than can a right.

I don't think anyone (sane) believes that he doesn't have the authority to exclude aliens, or that doing so to those with no ties to the US would have the least restrictions, but the question that arises is the definition of a tie.  As the SCotUS also said it's a question of injury to the rights of others that comes into play and again, that's why it's key not to call the Executive's authority a right.  The rights of others cannot be abridged by virtue of an authority that does not carry the same level of right (i.e. constitutional).

If Trump's smart (and he's not, but sometimes he know when to leave well enough alone such as the law suits he dropped before taking office), he'll do the review, tighten up the checks, and then move on and hope the SCotUS decides there's no longer anything to decide (because if they decide and limit his authority, then it's done - testing things in court that can go against you when you really don't have anything to gain is silly).

Again, I don't think anyone feels that more robust or thorough checks on people coming from potentially dangerous regions is a problem.  The problem is that he didn't include the place all the 9/11 terrorists came from (instead he sold them billions of dollars in arms), and the language and scope of his order was inept.  Had he been more reasonable and sensible, he could have easily worked on increasing the vetting and implementing stronger restrictions and actually achieved something, instead of attempting to grandstand and show who was boss and falling flat on his face.
Phil, I'm using "right" and "authority" interchangeably.  The point is the President gets his authority to exclude aliens from a Congressional law not SCOTUS.    SCOTUS just ruled that as long as the alien has no ties to America or Americans, that authority granted in legislation is constitutional.  If a president extends the vetting to make it impossible for that alien to get in unless he can show "he can walk on water", SCOTUS would have to reverse its own opinion to stop him from that kind of extreme vetting.  Remember the whole point of what Trump is doing is to make the vetting extreme.  So I'm saying the he's going to make a splash with the new vetting ruling to show how tough he is.  His supporters will cheer and enemies will scowl.  But, SCOTUS has to approve or reverse their own 9-0 ruling.

One other thing.  The anti-Trump forces are downplaying the SCOTUS decision.  They say it only effects a few tourists and photographers who want to visit Yosemite and get sunset pictures from Inspiration Point.  That's nonsense.  His EO stops 99.9% of all people living in the 6 countries. They don't have any ties to America.  So if any of them are terrorists trying to sneak in, he's stopping them with the EO.  People who have ties represent only an tiny percentage of the six countries.

Finally, the argument that the 9-11 terrorists were mainly Saudi has nothing to do with the selection of countries. 9-11 was 16 years ago.  After all, Japan is a close ally who was once our mortal enemy.  But the main issue is that the 6 nations in the EO are failed states or terrorist states.  It's difficult to vet people who want to come here.  Saudi Arabia is not a failed state who also chops the heads off of terrorists,  We can vet people from there more easily.  They are also a strong ally so political decisions are in play as well.  These other countries are not our allies.  The whole point of the EO is to give the government 90 days to review and adjust the vetting process to take any holes in it that might let in terrorists.  Hasn't your country Australia tightened up the rules since 9-11 for aliens to gain entry? 

scyth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3889 on: June 27, 2017, 11:10:27 am »

Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3890 on: June 27, 2017, 12:29:08 pm »

...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdP8TiKY8dE


...

Yeah Project Veritas is a reliable source...oh wait they aren't...Google it
Logged

scyth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3891 on: June 27, 2017, 12:37:09 pm »

Yeah Project Veritas is a reliable source...oh wait they aren't...Google it

 ;D

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40414886

not enough though
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3892 on: June 27, 2017, 12:45:42 pm »

;D

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40414886

not enough though

And that has zero to do with Project Veritas...

What's your point?
That CNN isn't perfect?
Pretty sure nobody is :-)
« Last Edit: June 27, 2017, 12:48:52 pm by Schewe »
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3893 on: June 27, 2017, 01:34:47 pm »

Wow, even millionaires are thinking Trump isn't doing so well!

Trump's millionaire voters are losing faith — government dysfunction a top worry

Quote
CNBC's Millionaire Survey finds that half of all millionaires surveyed are now anti-Trump; 29 percent are pro-Trump.

The millionaires see government dysfunction as the biggest risk.

Among those millionaires surveyed, 45 percent said they voted for Trump.

39 percent identified as Republican.


President Donald Trump is losing support among millionaires, who increasingly worry about government dysfunction.

CNBC's Millionaire Survey found that 45 percent of millionaire respondents voted for Trump, compared with 41 percent for Hillary Clinton. (The survey respondents were 39 percent Republican, 24 percent Democrat and 35 percent independent).

Yet when asked to rate Trump's first 100 days, Trump ranked 38 overall on a scale of 1 to 100.

And when analyzed by "pro-Trump" and "anti-Trump" attitudes, 50 percent of millionaires are now anti-Trump, while only 29 percent are pro-Trump, according to the poll. Only 21 percent have mixed views. That means that some of the millionaire voters who voted for Trump have become "anti-Trump."

"He's an unconventional president, and I think many of these voters are still getting used to that," said George Walper, president of Spectrem Group, which conducts the survey. "And I think that the hopes for tax reform and health-care reform faded a bit."

When asked about the biggest risk to the economy over the next 12 months, government dysfunction ranked first, at 38 percent. Millionaires also said government dysfunction is the biggest threat to their personal wealth.

Logged

Littlefield

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 39
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3894 on: June 27, 2017, 01:42:09 pm »

MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WOULD GIVE UP ALCOHOL TO SEE DONALD TRUMP IMPEACHED, SURVEY SAYS

Personally, I've already given up drinking...sure glad I did otherwise this Trump stuff would drive me off the cliff!
Just when I thought Dems could not get weaker. These are probably Dems who drink vodka not good single malt Scotch. Lol
Don
Logged

scyth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3895 on: June 27, 2017, 01:57:16 pm »

Wow, even millionaires are thinking Trump isn't doing so well!
Jeff don't worry - for as long as we have Electoral College we shall win  ;D ...
Logged

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3896 on: June 27, 2017, 02:24:33 pm »

Couldn't decide whether to post it here or to the Climate & CO2 thread, it fits into both. Here it goes:

http://grist.org/briefly/this-professor-made-a-climate-change-powerpoint-for-trump-and-it-will-make-you-smile/
Logged

Bart_van_der_Wolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8914
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3897 on: June 27, 2017, 03:38:20 pm »

Couldn't decide whether to post it here or to the Climate & CO2 thread, it fits into both. Here it goes:

http://grist.org/briefly/this-professor-made-a-climate-change-powerpoint-for-trump-and-it-will-make-you-smile/

Excellent!

Cheers,
Bart
Logged
== If you do what you did, you'll get what you got. ==

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3898 on: June 27, 2017, 04:05:12 pm »

Wow, even millionaires are thinking Trump isn't doing so well!

Trump's millionaire voters are losing faith — government dysfunction a top worry


Trump didn't win because millionaires voted for him.  They voted for Hillary who they thought would keep the gravy train rolling for them with crony capitalism.  He won because the working man voted for him, you know, the deplorables.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #3899 on: June 27, 2017, 04:14:23 pm »

And that has zero to do with Project Veritas...

What's your point?
That CNN isn't perfect?
Pretty sure nobody is :-)
Unfortunately, the news media forgot what they learned in Journalism 101 in college.  That you present the facts, not color them to make a point.  The media now presents news politicized for their viewer's and reader's political viewpoints.  Just preaching to the choir to keep their bottom line healthy.  Most of it is biased liberal and Democrat.  But whatever their viewpoint, it does a disservice to the public who gets fake news. 

Because of it, Trump's polling has been swinging down a little.  But what people forget is that pendulums have a way of swinging both ways.  Trump news is so negative and distorted that people are finally going to get it, including non-Trump supporters.  And then his numbers are going to swing the other way. 
Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 331   Go Up