Here's an article and Jeff's comments on collusion. Quote from above:
"In the meantime just in case somebody still believes Trump when he says This Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should've won., well here's Politifact to the rescue ~)"
I guess by rescue, Jeff means he agrees with the article.
Again doooode, ya gotta do better than that. I pointed to a
http://www.politifact.com article debunking Trump's claim that "
This Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should've won." was a pants-on-fire lie.
And that is somehow tantamount to an accusation of collusion by Trump how?
We all know (even Trump now but he blames it on Obama) that Russia interfered with our election, right? You believe that, right?
So, my saying "rescue" means I agree with the article is a true statement...
My saying "rescue" means I'm accusing Trump of collusion is a
pants-on-fire claim...
#BUZZZZZ Thank's for playing our game...wanna try again?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I never said Trump colluded with Russia...if he did collude, he wouldn't have been capable of keeping his big mouth shut and not brag about it.
What I'm pretty sure about is there is likely some collusion with Russia on the part of Trump's campaign and/or his "satellites".
We know Flynn was talking with the Russians and lied about it.
We know Kushner talked to the Russians and lied about it.
We're pretty sure Manafort was talking to the Russians and we know he was talking Ukrainians who were Russian supporters and lied about it.
We know Carter Page went to Russia with the Trump campaign permission and we know he had been under FBI investigation because he was being requited by known Russian spies.
We know Roger Stone was bragging about Podesta coming under fire just before his emails were released (funny how he predicted that, huh).
What I'm also sure about was that Trump was acting as a "
polezni durak" (useful idiot). Michael Hayden, former NSA director and former CIA director, described Trump as a
polezni durak, translating the term as "the useful fool, some naif, manipulated by Moscow, secretly held in contempt, but whose blind support is happily accepted and exploited".
Heck, Trump even begged the Russians to try to hack Clinton's emails and release them. And while Trump may have said that largely in jest, don't think for a moment he's wasn't reveling in the release of the DNC Server and Podesta's emails so while Trump may not have colluded, he sure did benefit, right?
But that's why we're having this whole investigation...to find out who did what and why and how to keep it from ever happening again.