Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: minimalism 1  (Read 5683 times)

marton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2017, 09:25:39 pm »

Hmmmm... no, I can't say I agree. First, I think that the original shape in its entirety is important. Second, while I can't speak for the OP, I suspect (from the square crop) that the centered composition is on purpose, and I think it's appropriate for this image. It gives the image balance. Cropping as you've done adds a tension that creates a whole different (and less successful) image, IMO. I also prefer the lack of texture in the snow. It helps to keep one's focus on the beautiful shape, texture and tonality. Adding texture to the snow would diminish the image by giving us unneeded realism and context.

I wouldn't change Kikashi's image. It's lovely. Just my humble opinion, of course. :)

Fair enough. It was simply a suggested alternative approach. I wouldn't choose mine either ultimately even though centered comps are best avoided. 
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2017, 12:39:56 am »

Of the three versions posted so far Jeremy's original is clearly the best, IMHO. The two suggested "improvements" both look pretentious and much less convincing to me. As for centered comps, I hear a voice whispering, "Hey, Edward W! Why don't you move that Pepper off-center? And that Nautilus shell is so boring!"    ???
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5248
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2017, 12:42:09 am »

I think JNB's analysis of the image is spot on. A successful image should not be measured by preexisting guidelines of what constitutes a good image. As already stated, one does not necessarily need "texture", or certain "shapes", or the rule of thirds or a certain amount of negative space, to create a successful image. If the image has impact and looks good, we should instead, analyse why it works and not impose "rules" from without. I am often guilty of doing this myself. Good critique is not always easy. We all have preconceptions of what constitutes a good image.

JR
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2017, 02:46:04 am »

A successful image should not be measured by preexisting guidelines of what constitutes a good image.

All images, successful or not, are measured by pre-existing guidelines. It cannot be otherwise.

The guidelines might be poorly understood, and a person might not know, or be able to express, why he likes or dislikes a particular image, but the guidelines must exist for any impression to exist.
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2017, 04:02:19 am »

All images, successful or not, are measured by pre-existing guidelines. It cannot be otherwise.

The guidelines might be poorly understood, and a person might not know, or be able to express, why he likes or dislikes a particular image, but the guidelines must exist for any impression to exist.

Who wrote the guidelines? Was it one person, or was it a committee?

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2017, 06:03:46 am »

Who wrote the guidelines? Was it one person, or was it a committee?

Countless millions of people throughout the ages have written the guidelines or expressed the guidelines in some way, although they might not always have titled them as guidelines.

Every child from the date of its birth begins to learn guidelines in order to interpret what it sees.

For example, a child soon learns that any object it sees, which is partly obscured by another object, must be behind or further away than the object which partially obscures it.
That's an obvious fact for all adults and young children, but we forget that it is a guideline which we all had to learn as a baby. Okay?  ;)
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2017, 10:19:44 am »

Just because there are "guidelines" does not mean that they are all relevant to every image.
What some of us have been arguing is that the guidelines that some have recommended in order to "improve" Jeremy's image do not, in fact, improve it.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #27 on: January 15, 2017, 10:31:41 am »

Central placement, while it may not work quite well in rectangular formats, is actually well suited for a square one.

Speaking about guidelines, a kind reminder of the forum etiquette: while unwritten, it has been accepted as courteous to ask before playing with someone's photograph. PM would be the best.

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2017, 11:52:23 am »

Central placement, while it may not work quite well in rectangular formats, is actually well suited for a square one.

Speaking about guidelines, a kind reminder of the forum etiquette: while unwritten, it has been accepted as courteous to ask before playing with someone's photograph. PM would be the best.

Is that another ad hominem? They seem to be changing definition every day!

;-)

Rob

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #29 on: January 15, 2017, 02:02:43 pm »

All images, successful or not, are measured by pre-existing guidelines. It cannot be otherwise.

The guidelines might be poorly understood, and a person might not know, or be able to express, why he likes or dislikes a particular image, but the guidelines must exist for any impression to exist.

I think you are confusing cause and effect. A consensus has developed over the years regarding composition of images. It works, for many images, perhaps most. It doesn't work for many other images. Perhaps this is one.

Your last sentence at best simply meaningless, insofar as it implies (to be kind) or states (to be accurate) that I am - nobody is - allowed to have an impression of any image in the absence of guidelines. In fact, "meaningless" is unnecessarily kind. It's drivel.

I don't think there are any guidelines which cover bordering a black and white image in shades of cyan, but I certainly have an opinion about it. It's a bizarre thing to do.

Central placement, while it may not work quite well in rectangular formats, is actually well suited for a square one.

Quite

Speaking about guidelines, a kind reminder of the forum etiquette: while unwritten, it has been accepted as courteous to ask before playing with someone's photograph. PM would be the best.

Thanks for the support, but I have always taken the view that if I post an image here, it's open season for anyone to fiddle with it, the only provisos being that it's done in an attempt to be helpful, or at least interesting, and of course that it's not done for financial gain.

Kikashi, I hope you don't mind but I played around with your file just for ideas sake. Feel free to ignore it if you wish, but centered compositions are generally to be avoided as they can be quite dull.

As I say above, I've no objection. Your version is interesting, but it's not my vision. I centred the whole of the hole in the ice and snow because it felt right to me to do it that way. You have produced a completely different photograph.

Jeremy

PS: my name is Jeremy. Kikashi is a handle I use here and elsewhere. It's a term in Go.
Logged

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5248
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #30 on: January 15, 2017, 02:19:10 pm »

Ray, I agree with you. I expressed my myself poorly. I meant to say what Eric has stated. It is well established that most, if not all of the compositional guidelines and principles in photography come from painting and the other arts. They are interrelated.

JR
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #31 on: January 15, 2017, 06:15:16 pm »


Your last sentence at best simply meaningless, insofar as it implies (to be kind) or states (to be accurate) that I am - nobody is - allowed to have an impression of any image in the absence of guidelines. In fact, "meaningless" is unnecessarily kind. It's drivel.


Jeremy,
The issue is not one of being allowed to have an impression in the absence of guidelines. Rather, it's just a natural and unavoidable state of affairs that everyone, when viewing an image, will automatically use guidelines that they have processed and interpreted and attached a certain significance to, during the course of their life.

Of course, I'm using the term 'guideline' in a very broad sense, and such guidelines are not always able to be clearly articulated by each individual. An example of this would be the situation of someone liking or disliking an image but not being able to express why.

In other words, an image might resonate with certain embedded guidelines within the individual, but what those guidelines are specifically might sometimes be difficult for the individual to articulate.

Quote
I don't think there are any guidelines which cover bordering a black and white image in shades of cyan, but I certainly have an opinion about it. It's a bizarre thing to do.

The guidelines here relate to the issue of contrast. As I mentioned earlier, the relatively large area of ice surrounding the water is so devoid of detail and shade that it feels as boring as a blank sheet of white paper.

The dark and detailed patch of water in the centre partially redresses that problem, but not entirely. The expanse of white surrounding the hole is too great for a pleasing, compositional balance (in my opinion of course, humble or otherwise).  ;)

By creating a pale cyan border, within an outer black frame, I was simply trying to compensate for the boring expanse of white, by introducing an additional feature of contrast. The color cyan is also suggestive of a blue sky reflected off the ice.

Now you might find it bizarre. No problem. However, I think that 'bizarre' might be preferable to 'boring'.  ;)
Logged

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3307
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #32 on: January 15, 2017, 11:45:28 pm »

Well done. I like the first one. I think it's one of your strongest pictures.
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #33 on: January 16, 2017, 03:48:26 am »

Jeremy,
The issue is not one of being allowed to have an impression in the absence of guidelines. Rather, it's just a natural and unavoidable state of affairs that everyone, when viewing an image, will automatically use guidelines that they have processed and interpreted and attached a certain significance to, during the course of their life.

Maybe you expressed yourself clumsily. It's hard to interpret what you wrote: "the guidelines must exist for any impression to exist" in a way other than mine, however.

The guidelines here relate to the issue of contrast. As I mentioned earlier, the relatively large area of ice surrounding the water is so devoid of detail and shade that it feels as boring as a blank sheet of white paper.

There's some detail there, if you look for it. It's less apparent in the jpeg conversion for posting than it is in the original file. I'm not sure that creating grey snow is the answer, but I appreciate that you were editing my jpeg, not my raw file.

By creating a pale cyan border, within an outer black frame, I was simply trying to compensate for the boring expanse of white, by introducing an additional feature of contrast. The color cyan is also suggestive of a blue sky reflected off the ice.

Now you might find it bizarre. No problem. However, I think that 'bizarre' might be preferable to 'boring'.  ;)

The sky wasn't blue and I think wouldn't have been that colour if it had been. The blue surrounding is completely out of keeping with the minimalist approach I was hoping would work.

Anyway, I'm glad to have provoked an interesting discussion.

Jeremy
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #34 on: January 16, 2017, 04:19:39 am »

Ray, I agree with you. I expressed my myself poorly. I meant to say what Eric has stated. It is well established that most, if not all of the compositional guidelines and principles in photography come from painting and the other arts. They are interrelated.

JR

Which painters established the guidelines and who did they "consult" when they established them? It seems to me that we are going round in circles. If someone wants to put a straight jacket on their thinking by consulting the guidelines that is fine but insisting that others do likewise is plain wrong. An experienced photographer should frame and crop by instinct. If everyone followed the guidelines then all photographs would look similar?

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #35 on: January 16, 2017, 04:55:17 am »

Which painters established the guidelines and who did they "consult" when they established them? It seems to me that we are going round in circles. If someone wants to put a straight jacket on their thinking by consulting the guidelines that is fine but insisting that others do likewise is plain wrong. An experienced photographer should frame and crop by instinct. If everyone followed the guidelines then all photographs would look similar?

Stamper,
You're confusing guidelines with rules, which is perhaps understandable because the two terms are often used interchangeably.

However, I consider a guideline to be much more flexible than a rule.
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #36 on: January 16, 2017, 05:05:52 am »

Stamper,
You're confusing guidelines with rules, which is perhaps understandable because the two terms are often used interchangeably.

However, I consider a guideline to be much more flexible than a rule.

Is dancing on a head of a pin one of your other hobbies? ;) :D

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #37 on: January 16, 2017, 05:27:52 am »

Is dancing on a head of a pin one of your other hobbies? ;) :D

No. I don't consider myself to be a particularly good dancer. It's not one of my strong points.  ;)
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2017, 07:04:17 pm »

No. I don't consider myself to be a particularly good dancer. It's not one of my strong points.  ;)
Exactly what guidelines led you to that conclusion?  ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2965
Re: minimalism 1
« Reply #39 on: January 16, 2017, 08:06:53 pm »

Exactly what guidelines led you to that conclusion?  ;)
Two left feet perhaps... :o
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up