Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: gate  (Read 1232 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
gate
« on: September 18, 2016, 02:51:43 pm »

Thoughts?

Jeremy
Logged

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: gate
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2016, 08:50:47 am »

Great detail and colour, but the harsh, flat light isn't working in your favour. Being a human artifact, I'm looking for a story in the photo, but I'm not seeing one. Perhaps if the gate was slightly ajar...
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: gate
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2016, 09:03:12 am »

I would have taken this image if I had seen it but I don't think I would have posted it for a critique because most people would have thought it not worthy? An image that appeals to the photographer that saw it but not to an audience. :-\

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: gate
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2016, 09:27:58 am »

Great detail and colour, but the harsh, flat light isn't working in your favour. Being a human artifact, I'm looking for a story in the photo, but I'm not seeing one. Perhaps if the gate was slightly ajar...

I agree with Terry, Jeremy. It's a beautiful gate, but the picture is tourist photography. And Robert hit the nail on the head. It's a picture I'd have shot for myself but not for public consumption. You at least need sidelight for something like this in order for it to become more than reportage.

Here's a not yet famous adage I use on my local amateur photographers: Reportage tells you about an experience. Art gives you an experience.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: gate
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2016, 01:15:36 pm »

I have to agree with all the above critics.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: gate
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2016, 04:10:00 am »

With regret, I fear you're all correct. I was confusing my memories of a very pleasant day with photographic merit.

Russ: nicely put.

Onwards.

Jeremy
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: gate
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2016, 08:40:54 am »

With regret, I fear you're all correct. I was confusing my memories of a very pleasant day with photographic merit.
You are in good company, Jeremy.
I suspect that probably 80% of the photos I take function only as reminders of nice places I want to remember.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: gate
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2016, 03:13:59 pm »

You are in good company, Jeremy.
I suspect that probably 80% of the photos I take function only as reminders of nice places I want to remember.

That made me stop and think, Eric.

I haven't been off this island for over ten or more years, and to the towns beyond mine very rarely indeed after Ann passed on - why bother - for one, a restaurant meal ends up pretty similar to another... Yet, I make images at least every second day (except for those periods when varnishing rules my life) and I spend far too many hours a day at the computer, killing myself more rapidly than I need to do by challenging my vascular system too hard. I get withdrawal symptoms almost every day I don't shoot - symptoms that remind me of banks, too. Yet none of those photographs have the slightest thing to do with 'nice places I want to remember'. Mostly, I find it hard at times to recall where I shot what!

So out 'pecentages' have hugely different mathematical bases!

;-)

Rob

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: gate
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2016, 03:41:30 pm »

You are in good company, Jeremy.
I suspect that probably 80% of the photos I take function only as reminders of nice places I want to remember.


That made me stop and think, Eric.

I haven't been off this island for over ten or more years, and to the towns beyond mine very rarely indeed after Ann passed on - why bother - for one, a restaurant meal ends up pretty similar to another... Yet, I make images at least every second day (except for those periods when varnishing rules my life) and I spend far too many hours a day at the computer, killing myself more rapidly than I need to do by challenging my vascular system too hard. I get withdrawal symptoms almost every day I don't shoot - symptoms that remind me of banks, too. Yet none of those photographs have the slightest thing to do with 'nice places I want to remember'. Mostly, I find it hard at times to recall where I shot what!

So out 'pecentages' have hugely different mathematical bases!

;-)

Rob

+1 to each of you!
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: gate
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2016, 03:48:32 pm »

Actually, Rob, what I should have said was that probably 90% of the photos I take are taken for my own enjoyment.
If I leave out "places," will our percentages be a little closer?   ;)

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: gate
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2016, 04:29:48 pm »

With regret, I fear you're all correct. I was confusing my memories of a very pleasant day with photographic merit.
...
Onwards.

I wish your ability to take critique without whining, prima-donna tantrums, defensiveness, etc. is shared more readily across other threads and forums on LuLa ;)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: gate
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2016, 04:36:22 pm »

That'd be wonderful, Slobodan, but it ain't gonna happen -- unfortunately! Everybody wants a pat on the back. I'm a member of "everybody," and I'm pretty sure you are too. I hate to criticize, but sometimes I just have to.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: gate
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2016, 04:50:48 pm »

Actually, Rob, what I should have said was that probably 90% of the photos I take are taken for my own enjoyment.
If I leave out "places," will our percentages be a little closer?   ;)

Eric


Can you ratchet it up ten percent?

;-)

Rob

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: gate
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2016, 11:54:57 pm »


Can you ratchet it up ten percent?

;-)

Rob
The highest I'll go is 99%.
The rest are because my wife asked me to take them.   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)
Pages: [1]   Go Up