Any comment on the print quality of the 4900 versus the newer 9900 printer? Just curious to know if my 4900 is still state of the art.
same ink, same basic head technology, identical prints.
And it's an outstanding printer, although technically not "state of the art". the 9900 is several years old (at least 6), and the p9000 that replaces it has improved dMax, better blacks overall offering improved shadow detail and clarity, and a new yellow ink that has far better longevity so the Epson inks are competitive with others in fade resistance.
Visually the difference is extremely subtle on most images, although an occasional image the difference is more visible.
Maybe you thinking he bought a new p9000, sounds like Mike just took his 4900 out of production and prints that work on a printer he already had, a 9900.
regarding clogging, the 4900 is certainly the worst performing epson ever built in this regards. I have a p9000 that is approaching a year old, used occasionally, and have only needed a clean 3 or 4 times. Lately I've switched between MK and PK several times and only once did it clean, something most epsons seem to require every time you switch. My 9900 was pretty good (5 years, only one maintenance tank replaced so it shows how little ink consumed in cleaning), but the p9000 appears to be better.