Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Zion  (Read 1466 times)

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Zion
« on: August 27, 2016, 10:52:32 pm »

.

wmchauncey

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 793
Re: Zion
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2016, 03:16:27 pm »

They give the impression that your approaching the mountain in the last image.
Logged
The things you do for yourself die with

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Zion
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2016, 09:40:56 pm »

A couple more

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Zion
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2016, 12:24:17 am »

I'll ne visiting Kolob Terrace and Kolob Canyon as well as the Zion Canton scenic drive.  Any suggestions there?

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Zion
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2016, 03:42:47 am »

I like 3-67 very much, Armand, but was it really so magenta?

Jeremy
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Zion
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2016, 08:59:18 am »

I'll ne visiting Kolob Terrace and Kolob Canyon as well as the Zion Canton scenic drive.  Any suggestions there?

I did not go to Kolob area. The drive it's the one from Springdale to Bryce, right? If that's the one it is truly beautiful. You could stop every 100 feet and find something to photograph or worth pursuing further.
As for suggestions, give yourself a little time to make some stops and try not to go midday. It's still beautiful but not as photogenic. If it's stormy, any time will do.

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Zion
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2016, 09:02:14 am »

I like 3-67 very much, Armand, but was it really so magenta?

Jeremy

It it quite close to what I recall. It's just before the storm came our way. Very unusual light, quite dim though; I didn't carry my tripod with me so this was a iso 3200 shot. Good enough for what I wanted but it would have been even better with a lower iso.
Pages: [1]   Go Up