I know it's conventional to use a really slow shutter speed for falling water, to create a sliky smooth effect which is often preferred, apparently, by the viewer, but it seems odd to me in this shot. I tend to think if I'd been there, I'd have seen a clear, lucid, transparent effect with the rocks clearly visible behind the flow of water (unless it is an extremely polluted brook, which it might be for all I know). Instead, I'm getting the impression of huge vats of spilt milk flowing down the rocky slope.
The foreground is generally too cluttered and I suspect a fast shutter speed (say 1/500th) might have produced a more appealing effect.