Interesting?
Then, unfortunately, I would have to say that no, this photograph is not particularly interesting. There does not appear to be any story, nor, from your point of view as the photographer was there any story behind this. It looks like a snapshot. I guess B/W makes it a little more artsy?
I find it quite interesting. It has lots of ambiguity, raising lots of questions.For example: "Is the guy in the chair experiencing post-coital ecstasy?" or "How long has he been dead?"The two massage therapists seem to be ignoring him entirely.The whole scene is rather bizarre.
Mine did too, Slobodan. I guess it's Jeremy who's in trouble.
... Move the first word on the second line up to the first line, and insert a pause.
I didn't consider this a "masterpiece" of street and I didn't even infer it was "street"....others have however. I thought it was amusing and had some ambiguity. The fact he was on a public street bent over expecting a £5 massage and that in fact something else might happen looked as if it was worth taking. The two ladies are from a Thai massage parlour that I thought for years might be a knocking shop. To sum up .... a sense of humour was needed whilst viewing the image.
Some days you're way too much with the double entendres. LOL
