I don't know the british politics but Mr Cameron really seems to be a grosteque political figure (cynical and stupid).
I see it rather differently: I see him as a realist who managed to drag the UK out of the socialist decline that had already consumed the Thatcher gains. (Blair was perhaps not as bad as he was eventually painted, at least he was able to steer a more moderate form of leftism.) The lukewarmth of the Liberals has never been worth much - Cameron rescued us from that unholy alliance at the last election. His ultimate error was in trusting the intelligence of the football crowds, the tabloid fodder and even his own party members.
But in the end, the Tories reverted to the thing they can't avoid because it's in the DNA: fratricide. Just as they did for Maggie and almost every other top gun they ever had. I never voted for any other party than the Tories, and today, if I had to vote again, it would probably be for the Scots Nats if only because their agenda is perfectly clear. A possible disaster, but what's the difference?
I regret the fact that our youth has been denied a wonderful panorama of life choices just to forward the aims of a greedy bunch of egomaniacs in London. May they rot in hell and somebody entirely else gets elected next time round.
Anyway, as I tried to show in my first comment on this theme, the wrong criteria were used as basis for choice. It ended up having nothing to do with Europe, jobs in Europe, exports, imports or anything else rational and quantifiable: it degenerated into fear of religious invasion. The entire campaign to quit has been one of fear and hatred. How sad to think Jo Cox had to be murdered for this result; that so many thousands of soldiers of different nationalities lie in graves in the war cemeteries of France, and all for this.