This thread is absolutely mind-bogglingly amazing: it was an act of Islamic terrorism and everyone is discussing... gun control??? As if a determined terrorist would not be able to gain access to whatever arms he needs even if guns are outlawed (like in France)
Slobodan, the problem, isn't so clear-cut, mainly because it just flows conveniently into the general scenario of gun killings. That way, it's easier for people to show their horror at the events, whereas if they were to voice their opinions in any other manner, they would almost certainly come under fire from the PC brigade. About an hour ago I watched a 'debate' on France 24 tv and on the panel were two guys representing different aspects of gay rights, one was French, the other of Arabic origin. Both were absolutely disinterested in anything to do with religion as per Islam, both were concerned that the press didn't scream out for gay rights and that, I'm afraid, was all they gave a hoot about. A third man on the panel was American, some Republican official, and he was totally outgunned, and also too hesitant to be of any value.
What wasn't happening was anyone saying that they deplored the gay movement. The assumption (of being gay) was that it was the most natural thing in the world. Something called Stonewall (a street march) was touted as happening later on, delayed because of the 'football'; talk about gay ads!
Just before that, I watched Ms Clinton speaking in Ohio. She is one capable public speaker! No umms, errs, or visible reference notes, and she never missed a measured beat. I envied her her abilities! As a public person with potential for the highest office, she was utterly believable. Contrast her with Trump, and it is quite frightening. I make no comment on the policies - I don't know enough about them - but from the aspect of thinking of Trump in international political situations... oh dear.
Our (your) public figures really do need to be seen to know how to deport themselves responsibly.
But back to the killings. There will always be mad people; they will always find the means to their ends; if this particular guy was a died-in-the-wool ISIS chap, he made a brilliant choice of target: it has caused divisions in the 'host' nation and increased the dislikes/fears/suspicions of one set of moralities towards another. If he was a 'lone wolf' then so what: he espoused the ISIS cause very loudly and clearly, it seems. Regarding gun laws: there clearly aren't any - that mean anything, that is. The NRA obviously owns both government and redneck souls. Invest in Stetsons; sales are sure to go up.
I also learned a new acronym: LGBT - sounds like something to do with the railways. First time it's crossed my ears. I am having difficulty with the B, but I'm sure I'll find out what it stands for in time.
Rob
P.S. I have just read Chris's post: I trust this one of mine is not thought of as infammatory. It's not meant to be - just my reading of what's happening right now, and why there will be no solutions any time soon, and how everything gets taken over by a vested interest, however tragic the event..