Topic: P1 IQ3-100 images? (Read 38561 times)

jng · « **Reply #20 on:** June 03, 2016, 12:24:12 am »

Quote from: marcerny on June 02, 2016, 03:15:20 pm

to fill the amateur section...

Cheers,

Marc

Thanks for sharing - that's a terrific image of Hong Kong and Victoria Harbor. I'm actually headed to Hong Kong in a week on business. I wasn't planning to bring my MF kit but your photo has me rethinking this...

John

synn · « **Reply #21 on:** June 03, 2016, 03:20:29 am »

Quote from: jng on June 02, 2016, 12:57:36 pm

Yes, beautiful images indeed!

I don't make my living through photography (except when it involves a microscope ). But that's not to say that my MFDB sits around unused. It has and probably always will have a low shot count, even though the Nikon usually stays in the closet. Working more slowly and on a tripod for landscape and still life (vs. shooting a sporting event), aside from some exposure bracketing and framing adjustments, the need/benefit to firing off a ton of shots is not there for me. Perhaps this discipline - if you can call it that - carried over from my days of using film. I was certainly more judicious when shooting a 12-exposure roll of 120 than a roll of 135. But to reiterate: I don't make my living at this...

John

Word for word, my thoughts on this topic too.

Hell, I don't even know the shot counts of my cameras. Never bothered to check.
All I know is that when I bring the MF kit out, I know exactly what I am shooting. The Fuji and the Nikon kits see more "Let's see what I can bring home" use.

This weekend for example, I am in Vienna with just the MF kit, because I know exactly what images I will be making here.

By the way, incredible images posted in the thread. Thanks for all those who contributed.

Richard Osbourne · « **Reply #22 on:** June 06, 2016, 01:52:51 pm »

Thanks for the great images, people - really appreciated seeing them. Makes a nice change from all the arguing!

uaiomex · « **Reply #23 on:** June 07, 2016, 07:22:31 pm »

Thanks Steven. Great set of nature images.

Quote from: stevenfr on June 01, 2016, 10:58:08 pm

Eduardo

A few images from New Zealand. Not my typical imagery that sells for me, but helps broaden my portfolio.

These are files that were on my iPad so they may not be finalized. They should give you a sense for the images.

Steven

http://www.friedmanphoto.com

Christopher · « **Reply #24 on:** June 13, 2016, 11:14:23 am »

Ok really not the image I had in mind, but as I'm quite busy and don't have time to actually work on my images from the recent trip I wanted to post something else.

It is only a very quick and dirty image taken with the IQ100 and the XF in focus stacking. It is amazing how fast it is possible to do these stacks with the XF.

Doug Peterson · « **Reply #25 on:** June 13, 2016, 11:35:45 am »

Quote from: Christopher on June 13, 2016, 11:14:23 am

It is only a very quick and dirty image taken with the IQ100 and the XF in focus stacking. It is amazing how fast it is possible to do these stacks with the XF.

It really is. I've done some pretty technically challenging focus stacks and the XF focus stacking tool is the real deal.

That's the main reason we are doing a webinar on the tips and techniques of modern focus stacking. Based on the number of people that have signed up so far there is clearly a lot of interest out there. My guess is a lot of them have previously tried it and found it to be a PITA and highly error prone. The XF tool doesn't make it a point-and-shoot experience, but it's about as close as I've ever seen in the world of focus stacking.

BernardLanguillier · « **Reply #26 on:** June 13, 2016, 07:50:51 pm »

Quote from: Christopher on June 13, 2016, 11:14:23 am

Ok really not the image I had in mind, but as I'm quite busy and don't have time to actually work on my images from the recent trip I wanted to post something else.

Very nice, thanks for posting!

Great inputs, but as of now it seems that there are only 4 photographers on this forum owning an IQ3-100 interested in contributing their images?

Cheers,
Bernard

vjbelle · « **Reply #27 on:** June 14, 2016, 08:43:41 am »

From a recent trip to Palouse...... Actus IQ3-100 120mm Asph Digitar.

vjbelle · « **Reply #28 on:** June 14, 2016, 08:44:42 am »

And..... one more from Palouse - Actus IQ3-100 180mm Digitar.

Wayne Fox · « **Reply #29 on:** June 26, 2016, 12:46:31 am »

First shoot with my IQ3 100, using an arca swiss rm3di. First image is with the Rodenstock 28mm (using Center filter). Second shot is with the Rodenstock 40mm. LCC seemed to clean up both files nicely, but it is pretty obvious looking at the LCC shots the sensor has more lens cast than the IQ3 80. Not sure I can shift the 28mm at all, will have to do some testing. 40mm wasn't nearly as severe, I'll have to test to see how much shift I can get away with.

BernardLanguillier · « **Reply #30 on:** June 27, 2016, 01:45:20 am »

Nice! Thanks for sharing.

Cheers,
Bernard

E.J. Peiker · « **Reply #31 on:** June 27, 2016, 05:16:51 pm »

Here's an aerial of the Ord River Delta in northwestern Australia taken with the XF, IQ3-100mp and S-K 80mm lens:

stevenfr · « **Reply #32 on:** June 27, 2016, 07:04:40 pm »

E.J. Beautiful image.

Steven
http://www.friedmanphoto.com

DrakeJ · « **Reply #33 on:** June 28, 2016, 01:59:25 am »

Quote from: E.J. Peiker on June 27, 2016, 05:16:51 pm

Here's an aerial of the Ord River Delta in northwestern Australia taken with the XF, IQ3-100mp and S-K 80mm lens:

Wow!

Wayne Fox · « **Reply #34 on:** June 29, 2016, 01:58:40 am »

very cool.

BernardLanguillier · « **Reply #35 on:** June 29, 2016, 03:04:53 am »

Quote from: E.J. Peiker on June 27, 2016, 05:16:51 pm

Here's an aerial of the Ord River Delta in northwestern Australia taken with the XF, IQ3-100mp and S-K 80mm lens:

Neat, how high were you?

Cheers,
Bernard

dchew · « **Reply #36 on:** June 29, 2016, 06:26:45 am »

E J that is fantastic.

I think there are many obvious reasons for the low-count used backs in the market. Some have already been mentioned. Most amateurs who shoot these backs either have a day job or are retired. Every amateur I know who has a back also has another smaller-format camera system, either DSLR or mirrorless. All these add up to the back being used less frequently than pro use.

The back I traded in had something like 11k actuations, which is probably in line with most of my other cameras. The difference is I used that back for 5 years! Not many shots per month.

I've had the 3100 now for about a month with zero opportunity to get out and even less confluence of time with good light. So far only one mediocre opportunity, and the light turned out to be a bust.

Dave
Edit: 2-image stitch, shifted 18mm each way, sk60xl, Alpa STC, 1 deg tilt.

E.J. Peiker · « **Reply #37 on:** June 29, 2016, 07:44:35 am »

Quote from: BernardLanguillier on June 29, 2016, 03:04:53 am

Neat, how high were you?

Cheers,
Bernard

2500 ft AGL

eronald · « **Reply #38 on:** June 29, 2016, 08:57:15 am »

Quote from: E.J. Peiker on June 29, 2016, 07:44:35 am

2500 ft AGL

e j

that's an incredible pic on your website -playa de gueirua- looks like an sf illustration.

Edmund

E.J. Peiker · « **Reply #39 on:** June 29, 2016, 09:09:40 am »

Quote from: eronald on June 29, 2016, 08:57:15 am

e j

that's an incredible pic on your website -playa de gueirua- looks like an sf illustration.

Edmund

Photographing that was among the more incredible photo moments I've had. That one was taken with an a7R Mk II though

. I don't think I would have wanted to hike into that place with a Phase system

. Or rather, I don't think I would want to make the climb back out with a Phase system.

Author Topic: P1 IQ3-100 images? (Read 38561 times)