Hi,
I remember the early era of digital photography back in 2000 and 2001. Michael was one of the first pros with an extensive experience in analogue photography who approached the new technology openminded on the one hand and without overwhelming euphoria on the other hand. His attitude was realistic and pragmatic.
As I never had the luck to meet Michael in person, I want to contribute two early examples of this attitude. For me they are a kind of historical memory.
In 2000 (afair) Michael compared a DSLR (Canon`s D30) and film. He had an methodological approach but that was based on real world photos and samples instead of pixel peeping and technical gibberish. He had an opinion and he could justify it. One of his essential evaluation criteria was, how the final product - the print - would look like. He remained true to this principle for all the years and I'm glad, that Kevin shares and continues this philosophy! I have found an early copy of "D30 Vs. Provia 100F" on web.archive.org, so you can enjoy it in the old charme of Luminous Landscape:
http://web.archive.org/web/20020803213950/http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/d30/d30_vs_film.shtmlThe second example I want to contribute is his wonderful comparison of Canons D30 and D60 with 35mm and medium format film. Man, how many hours have I stared at theese skyline-photos :-) Enjoy "Canon EOS D60 vs. Medium Format":
http://web.archive.org/web/20021004073638/http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/d60/d60.shtmlBest regards from Germany,
Heiko