I had been all on for a P600 but grew impressed at reports on Canon and the lack of clogging, approach to head replacement (I live in a rural area, service is... time-consuming). Given my likely low volume approach, this is a factor for me.
Wondering if people had any experience of both, from what I can see operating costs and print quality are much of a muchness.
Cheers
I currently have the P600, P400, Canon Pro-100, and Canon Pro-1 in house, and have been evaluating them for about a year. One thing I know for sure. Each one has a sweet spot where it would be the best choice, and each one has an achilles heel or two that can make it the worst choice depending on what type of media you most wish to print on and how frequently you print.
Here's my "executive summary"
Pro-1: Best in class for image quality. Slightly better than P600 due to very slightly better color gamut and the chroma optimizer. Truly stunning output, both color and B&W, but the other printers are certainly competitive in the print quality category. The Pro-1 is definitly a poor choice if you wish to print on fine art matte media due to huge page margin restrictions for which there are no practical work arounds. Also, absolutely by far and away the most expensive 13 inch printer to run if you use it infrequently. You can leave it for a few months and it will start up and run with amazing reliability, but you will pay a huge cost due to massive automatic cleaning cycles that the printer initiates with simple clock timer cycles based on days from last use. If you only use this printer once every couple of weeks or so, figure on several dollars of ink per letter-size print rather than approximately one dollar per 8x10" image size if you were to use the printer every day. That's how much ink goes down the waste tank to give endusers a perceived "clog-free" experience when this printer is not used daily. Aah, but the print quality...It's fantastic
Pro-100: A wonderful choice and very enonomical choice if resin coated (RC) photo papers are what you mostly want to print on. Unlike the Pro-1, the Pro-100 is sparing on ink wastage even for the infrequent user. Even though a dye-based printer, longevity is better than traditional color chromogenic processes (traditional wet lab prints) on RC media. However, the dyes are not compatible with spray finishes, and that's a bit disappointing because I generally like to spray any prints I give to others for better handling durability and light fade resistance. Really nice B&W due to its three channels of photo gray inks, and truly wonderful color print quality on RC inkjet photo paper. This is its sweet spot. The Pro-100 has same margin constraints as the Pro-1 on fine art matte media, and no dedicated MK ink, so both image quality and versatility suffer when printing on matte media. Matte paper printing is not this printer's forte
P-600: I really like this printer. Great output and versatility printing on a wide range of media. After some initially concerning "autoclean" cycles when brand new and for several days after the first priming of the new printer, the autoclean freqency settles right down, and this printer is running very clog-free year round in my lab (which gets to 25-30% RH in winter months). PK to MK switch is more problematic and potentially wasteful than Epson specs claim, because the printer will refuse to do the PK/MK ink swap if any one of the ink channels are running low on ink. You have to discard them to proceed, and that can mean several dollars or more of wasted ink. Trying to put the low ink cartridges back in to the printer to reclaim that residual ink is a fool's errand, because the printer then needs to reprime itself, thus wasting more ink every time a cartridge gets replaced. Bottom line: A really great printer with great image quality if you can dedicate it primarily to just gloss/luster media or to matte media. If you routinely need to print on a variety of both matte and glossy media, the best solution is to bite the bullet and buy two units (or one P400 along with a P600), dedicating one unit to MK and one to PK printing (or the P400 to whatever you want)
P-400: The sleeper in all of these discussions on "best printer" in the 13 inch class. I would heartily recommend it to photographers just wanting to get started in printmaking because it does nothing badly and just about everything pretty darn well. Serious printmakers will want to go upscale to P600/P800 models for better B&W output and slightly better image quality, but that said, the P400 comes the closest to the all-purpose printer for novice printers, IMHO. It even has some goodies (like best in class gloss optimizer) for advanced printmakers. Mine is running clog-free. No PK/MK ink swap issues, so you can go effortlessly between RC, matte, and fine art glossy luster papers at will. Has roll feed attachment, so it is competent with panorama printing that the Canon Pro 1 and Pro-100 printers can't do. The P400 does not have the sophistication of the P600 driver in terms of custom adjustments for thick papers and/or platten gap settings, or ink density limits, but my P400 nevertheless seems to handle all the media I've thrown at it with reasonable grace. Did I mention the gloss optimizer? This GO really excels with RC photo papers, and you can trick the printer into doing a second GO pass on fine art luster/glossy papers when the first pass isn't quite enough to eliminate all traces of gloss differential or bronzing, or with prints you've made on other pigment printers that don't have a GO option (like the P600)! Generic profiles for this printer tend to be made with "best photo" quality mode and they aren't very accurate if you switch to "Photo RPM" quality mode, but if you can make your own profiles or have some custom ones made using the Photo RPM mode, you will be rewarded with noticeably better photo quality. That's because the P400 does not have dedicated photo gray ink or light cyan or light magenta ink, so the RPM mode puts it into highest quality 5760x1400 dpi screening pattern which in turn helps overcome the lack of those light cyan and light magenta ink drops. A custom profile and Photo RPM setting brings the image quality on a par with the Canon Pro-100. P600 and Pro-1 still beat that quality level by some margin, not noticeable in a single stimulus viewing mode by the typical observer, but definitely noticeable to discerning viewers, particularly when making side-by-side comparisons to prints made on other printers in this 13 inch class.
I hope my summary helps others to make an informed decision on which 13 inch printer is best for them. The OP self selected as an infrequent user. That pretty much kills the Pro-1 for you, IMHO, all the others can handle low volume printing with reasonable grace, but it very important to also define what media type you really intend to use the most. The Pro-100 is great on RC and the most affordable, but P400 and/pr P600 are better choice if matte media is in your future and you also want better print longevity as well.
cheers,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com