The question I hvae is how does the new Canon compare with the old Canon. I see comparisons between Epson and Canon (e.g. P800 verse Pro-1000) but I don't see comparisons between the new Canon and the old; in this case, the iPF6450.
The other question I have is how does the color gamut of the printer (or any printer) compare to various displays gamuts (sRBG, Adobe 98, and P3).
Thank you for your time,
Perry
Sheet loading is now the same as with my 8300, so single sheet lined up with the orange lines at the front, rather than a slot at the top as the 6450.
After making several A3+ and A2 prints, I can confirm that the 40-50 seconds delay between printing finishing and lock being released to remove the print, gets quite irksome ;-)
The dual roll feed is very nifty - I've not tried the second roll unit as a take-up though.
The pro-2000 is much bigger and heavier.
As to gamut comparisons, take a profile and view it in your favourite profile analyser/viewer.
I say this, since it's not really something I look at when checking printers (I don't do comparative reviews).
The question is from a personal POV not one that has much connection with my print work - The print is the print and works within the gamut of whatever paper I choose. Now, I know that Canon and Epson marketing love things like 98% Pantone coverage, but that's graphicy print type stuff, and prone to the vagaries of marketing ;-)
One quick difference from the PRO-1000 is that when making custom media profiles, there are media options that have to CO switched off. I'm still testing this, but the CO does seem to make quite a difference to gloss differential and bronzing.