It has the potential to be a beautiful scene.
The problem some of us are seeing with the totally unrealistic colors in the OP image is due to how some browsers (e.g., Chrome) handle color management when no color profile is embedded in the image, as is the case here.
With an untagged image, Chrome and some other browsers take the RGB values and use the full range of the device screen, making the assumption that the device has an approximately sRGB gamut. But on a wide gamut monitor, that assumption is false, and displaying them this way can result in wildly wrong colors. Other browsers, like Firefox, don't make the same assumption, and the displayed colors of untagged images look similar to sRGB tagged images even on wide gamut monitors.
So when I look at the OP image in Firefox, it appears closer to "reality" than in does when I view it in Chrome, on a calibrated and profiled wide gamut monitor running Windows 10.
Now if I take the OP image into Photoshop and assign it an sRGB profile, and then save it with the profile embedded, it looks the same in either Chrome or Firefox on a wide gamut monitor. See the two attached images, one with sRGB profile embedded and the other not embedded, in your favorite browsers.
(Note: you have to click on them to see the difference; the non-color-managed thumbnails may look the same.)
Take home message: if you want to ensure that your image looks as close as possible to the way it does on your monitor, when viewed on a wide variety of other people's devices and browsers, then convert to sRGB and
embed the color profile.
For more info and a way to test your browsers, see this site:
Web Browser Color Management Test