Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Gradient  (Read 538 times)

James Clark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2347
Gradient
« on: March 20, 2016, 11:40:29 pm »

Curious about thoughts on the pebbles/shells in the lower left.  Might be a more pure abstract without them, but I feel like they add just enough context to ground the image (but maybe it shouldn't be grounded?)

Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Gradient
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2016, 12:14:29 am »

I say keep them. It feels more balanced with the pebbles and shells, and a bit more interesting.
Nice shot.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

drmike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 988
    • On Flickr:
Re: Gradient
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2016, 03:27:47 am »

+1
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Gradient
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2016, 04:50:29 am »

I agree. I don't think it's going to satisfy a purist definition of "abstract" even without the pebbles: it's too obviously identifiable as that which it is (and what it is is rather pleasing).

Jeremy
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13790
Re: Gradient
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 08:26:29 am »

Keep them. As previous commenters wrote, there's simply too many non-abstract elements to end up with an abstract shot.
Logged
Francois

James Clark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2347
Re: Gradient
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2016, 08:52:45 am »

Thanks.  I think you are all are right on both the question and the comments re: identifiably. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up