Full plate is 8.5x6.5 inches.
In this case FOV was indeed very close to that of a 15mm lens on 135 film.
FOV can be calculated as arctangent of the ratio of half of the diagonal of the frame to the focal length of the lens, times two. I just quickly ran the numbers (using command-line calculator) for 15mm on 135 and 85mm on full plate, and this is what we have:
deg(atan(sqrt(24**2+36**2)/2/15))*2 = 110.53 degrees (well, we knew that, but anyway...)
deg(atan(sqrt((8.5*25.4)**2+(6.5*25.4)**2)/2/85))*2 = 115.95 degrees
So, technically, Brandt's camera was indeed a wee bit wider, 14mm on 135 (114.18 degrees) would probably be the closest approximation. But then we have different aspect ratios... So 15mm as an approximation is still quite good