Topic: Geometry in Clay (Read 3689 times)

Rajan Parrikar · « **on:** February 12, 2016, 02:57:37 am »

Geometry in Clay. In the Mojave Desert of California and Nevada.

thierrylegros396 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 12, 2016, 03:20:04 am »

All are well done, but the 2nd is outstanding.

Thierry

petermfiore · « **Reply #2 on:** February 12, 2016, 03:30:43 am »

I very much like the pallet in the second one...Nice!

Peter

Paulo Bizarro · « **Reply #3 on:** February 12, 2016, 03:47:44 am »

Good series. My favourite is #1, the golden light is really nice.

francois · « **Reply #4 on:** February 12, 2016, 09:07:14 am »

I love the second one with the first being close. The last one is more abstract.

Eric Myrvaagnes · « **Reply #5 on:** February 12, 2016, 12:28:09 pm »

A fine set. And thanks for including the explanation on your blog. I will now start looking at mud cracks quite differently.

brandtb · « **Reply #6 on:** February 12, 2016, 01:05:32 pm »

very nice group

MattBurt · « **Reply #7 on:** February 12, 2016, 04:03:42 pm »

A very good set, the first two especially. Nice work!

Jeremy Roussak · « **Reply #8 on:** February 13, 2016, 04:36:46 am »

The first is the one that stands out for me. I love the redness in the cracks.

Jeremy

sdwilsonsct · « **Reply #9 on:** February 13, 2016, 10:53:21 am »

Quote from: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 12, 2016, 12:28:09 pm

A fine set. And thanks for including the explanation on your blog. I will now start looking at mud cracks quite differently.

Yes. Interesting photos and exposition.

Rajan Parrikar · « **Reply #10 on:** February 13, 2016, 12:12:05 pm »

Thank you, gentlemen.

Arlen · « **Reply #11 on:** February 15, 2016, 10:57:12 am »

A wonderful set, Rajan, and I really appreciate the description of their formation on your blog. I'm also a little partial to the second, if I had to pick just one.

Rajan Parrikar · « **Reply #12 on:** February 15, 2016, 11:05:19 am »

Quote from: Arlen on February 15, 2016, 10:57:12 am

A wonderful set, Rajan, and I really appreciate the description of their formation on your blog. I'm also a little partial to the second, if I had to pick just one.

Thanks, Arlen.

[I wish we had something like the 'Like' button to acknowledge commenters without the need to bump up the topic every single time.]

polaris-14 · « **Reply #13 on:** February 15, 2016, 12:02:25 pm »

Beautiful, Rajan! My favorite is number 2. Somehow you made those shapes "flow", if you know what I mean. Thanks for sharing!

Arlen · « **Reply #14 on:** February 15, 2016, 12:11:47 pm »

Quote from: Rajan Parrikar on February 15, 2016, 11:05:19 am

Thanks, Arlen.

[I wish we had something like the 'Like' button to acknowledge commenters without the need to bump up the topic every single time.]

I know what you mean, I think many of us wrestle with that. For what it's worth, I understand that your acknowledgement extends to us later commentators, too.

David Eckels · « **Reply #15 on:** February 15, 2016, 01:21:47 pm »

Sterling!

Quote from: Arlen on February 15, 2016, 12:11:47 pm

I understand that your acknowledgement extends to us later commentators, too.

Leszek Piotrowski · « **Reply #16 on:** February 15, 2016, 08:56:13 pm »

Rajan,

I've looked this set off and on for the past day or so,... and #2 is my favourite. Today I just "saw" a human figure ( looking left,... arms out stretched,... ) with the brown weed (brush) on the figures "chest". For me it adds a most surprising element to your image. Not sure if you planned the composition with that in mind,... but wow.

cheers, Leszek

Rajan Parrikar · « **Reply #17 on:** February 15, 2016, 09:02:48 pm »

Quote from: Leszek Piotrowski on February 15, 2016, 08:56:13 pm

Rajan,

I've looked this set off and on for the past day or so,... and #2 is my favourite. Today I just "saw" a human figure ( looking left,... arms out stretched,... ) with the brown weed (brush) on the figures "chest". For me it adds a most surprising element to your image. Not sure if you planned the composition with that in mind,... but wow.

cheers, Leszek

Leszek,

Thank you. No, I did not 'see' the figure you see. I'll take a closer look now. What came to my mind are Feynman diagrams when I saw the wiggles.

David & Adhika - thanks.

maddogmurph · « **Reply #18 on:** February 19, 2016, 05:43:51 pm »

I go away for 6 months and you still post nothing but spectacular images even in the abstract. Sometimes I'm jealous, other times I'm inspired, and other times I just know how much work you must put in. Well done mate.

Rajan Parrikar · « **Reply #19 on:** February 20, 2016, 01:40:46 am »

Quote from: maddogmurph on February 19, 2016, 05:43:51 pm

I go away for 6 months and you still post nothing but spectacular images even in the abstract. Sometimes I'm jealous, other times I'm inspired, and other times I just know how much work you must put in. Well done mate.

Thanks, Maddog.

Author Topic: Geometry in Clay (Read 3689 times)