Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: North Cascades  (Read 2844 times)

polaris-14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
    • Portfolio
North Cascades
« on: January 30, 2016, 07:00:57 pm »

I have been really into super telephoto landscape lately. This one is taken from San Juan Island, WA. That last few minutes of light hitting the North Cascades was a sight to see.

« Last Edit: February 02, 2016, 01:24:11 am by polaris-14 »
Logged
Adhika Lie
Website | Flickr

justlikebeingthere

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2016, 07:17:43 pm »

Looks grand. Nice layers.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2016, 08:07:43 pm »

Lovely.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

pcgpcg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
    • paulglasser
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2016, 08:13:31 pm »

Three Fingers and Liberty Mountain. If you have a higher res version you can probably see the lookout cabin on the south peak of Three Fingers.

Gorgeous!
« Last Edit: January 30, 2016, 08:19:05 pm by pcgpcg »
Logged

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2016, 08:55:38 am »

Beautiful, wild, raw.

Is the vignetting introduced or a result of the lens. In one sense, it focuses the viewer to the centre, but, as a photographer, wondering if it's an artifact bugs me. For non-photographers I doubt it's an issue.
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

polaris-14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
    • Portfolio
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2016, 11:29:20 am »

Thanks so much guys! Paul, thanks so much for naming the mountains. I am constantly amazed by the collective knowledge in this forum.

If you have a higher res version you can probably see the lookout cabin on the south peak of Three Fingers.

I tried looking into the full res picture and unfortunately cannot locate the cabin. Is it visible from this side of the Cascades?

Is the vignetting introduced or a result of the lens. In one sense, it focuses the viewer to the centre, but, as a photographer, wondering if it's an artifact bugs me. For non-photographers I doubt it's an issue.

It is an artifact of the Tamron 150-600 lens that vignettes quite a bit at 600mm. When I saw it, I liked the effect and decided to keep it.
Logged
Adhika Lie
Website | Flickr

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2016, 12:23:29 pm »

Very nice, Adhika. Is that ice in the foreground?

polaris-14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
    • Portfolio
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2016, 02:35:42 pm »

Very nice, Adhika. Is that ice in the foreground?

Thanks, Scott! It is not ice, unfortunately. It's actually the Puget Sound.
Logged
Adhika Lie
Website | Flickr

pcgpcg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
    • paulglasser
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2016, 03:20:30 pm »

I tried looking into the full res picture and unfortunately cannot locate the cabin. Is it visible from this side of the Cascades?
It should be as it is perched on the very top of the rock. I suspect it is not visible because it is painted white and the shingle roof is covered in snow.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2016, 11:13:27 am by pcgpcg »
Logged

Rajan Parrikar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3950
    • Rajan Parrikar
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2016, 01:27:32 am »

The image is one of dramatic effect. The one question I have is, do you have enough d-o-f for the distant mountains. At this size, there is a hint that they aren't as sharp but I could be wrong.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2016, 01:30:39 am by Rajan Parrikar »
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7395
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2016, 04:50:53 am »

Nice image, works really well.

polaris-14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
    • Portfolio
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2016, 11:25:12 am »

The image is one of dramatic effect. The one question I have is, do you have enough d-o-f for the distant mountains. At this size, there is a hint that they aren't as sharp but I could be wrong.

At f/8 and 600mm, no, the Cascades were not within the circle of confusion. It worked for me as a backdrop. What do you think?
Logged
Adhika Lie
Website | Flickr

Rajan Parrikar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3950
    • Rajan Parrikar
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2016, 12:34:07 pm »

At f/8 and 600mm, no, the Cascades were not within the circle of confusion. It worked for me as a backdrop. What do you think?

To me the distant peaks and the sweet light on them are the main plot, so I would have either focused on them (and taken the hit on the foreground trees) or stopped down more.

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2016, 11:55:41 pm »

To me the distant peaks and the sweet light on them are the main plot, so I would have either focused on them (and taken the hit on the foreground trees) or stopped down more.

...or made a series for focus-blending.
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

polaris-14

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
    • Portfolio
Re: North Cascades
« Reply #14 on: February 03, 2016, 12:59:42 am »

...or made a series for focus-blending.

That is indeed an option! :)
Logged
Adhika Lie
Website | Flickr
Pages: [1]   Go Up