I opened a few RAW files taken this fall to see if a conversion to Pro Photo RGB would be more effective than the sRGB versions I was familiar with. These particular images featured yellow Aspen leaves and blue skies and the yellow leaves had seemed to be a real challenge to reproduce with a tendency to appear brown or orange.
I was able to appreciate a slight difference in the yellows. The hue seemed clearer and brighter... more yellow. This difference wasn't so great, which I assume is in part a limitation of the generic laptop LCD I am using.
Here is the part I found interesting when I had a Pro Photo RGB and a sRGB example of the same image open in Photoshop; I noticed that if I viewed the screen off axis the Pro Photo version still seemed bright yellow while the sRGB version became noticeably pale and unsaturated. It seemed as if there was information in the ProPhoto file that I couldn't appreciate from a front view but that refused to be subdued when viewed from a side angle.
In the past I have justified remaining with a sRGB workflow because I felt my monitor would not present the extra gamut available in Adobe RGB and Pro Photo RGB.
Somehow, it seems as if the observation of the off axis appearance of my LCD is a strong suggestion that the extra gamut range has more benefit than I could have ever appreciated in the normal front view. I am not in a circumstance where I can set up a permanent photo workstation but I am eager to consider the benefits of the latest wide gamut monitors. I feel like I must be seeing a lot less than I could be.
I'm just wondering if any of this seems crazy or if it makes any sense.
Thank you.