Yes - I SAID THAT!! And I quote:
"it isn't worth it unless you absolutely must have the Dehaze and B&W fine-tuning (the only reason to go to LR CC instead of upgrading to LR stand-alone 6)"
It's all about perspective: If you're a "gotta have right away" kind of person then you might just think that $10/mo is worth it (even if you don't use PS). However, if that take the long view of "I've done very well without all the newest wiz-bang features for this long, another year or so won't kill me" then you might think "Meh - I'll wait for LR7".
I realize this is a minority view amongst consumers, but it's real.
I prefer to view the Creative Cloud Photographers package as acquiring Photoshop CC the premier photo editing package from Adobe, which includes Adobe Camera Raw Plugin for rendering raw files.
This alone justifies the monthly lease of US$9.99.
The "icing on the cake" so to speak is that you also get Lightroom CC
free gratis, bearing in mind that one of the primary functions of Lightroom the Develop Module is already provided in the Adobe Camera Raw Plugin. This is a no brainer for Adobe.
Users who are not interested in the advanced features available in Photoshop CC and wish to purchase the perpetual version of Lightroom version 6. are actually paying a high premium.
For me there is really no Lightroom CC package.