Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin  (Read 4085 times)

Gary Ferguson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 550
    • http://
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
« on: April 06, 2006, 01:35:03 PM »

Any experiences/views on HPR Satin?
Logged

jdyke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 123
    • http://www.jondyke.com
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2006, 11:44:45 AM »

Not that great apparently.....its much more expensive than the standard photo rag and the samples I have seen don't justify the extra cost.  The prints are supposed to have a bit of a sheen to then but side by side with the  normal stuff there is not a lot of difference (there is a very slight sheen in some colours if looked at an angle).
In my opinion this was a disspointing paper from Hahnemule and I would stick with the standard photorag or wait for the new pearl if you are after something with a bit more of a finish.
Logged

PetterStahre

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
    • http://www.studiostahre.se
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2006, 04:27:47 AM »

I prefer HPR Satin over HPR when I need dark blacks. The downside is a more limited dynamic range (less details in shadows).

Another downside is their quality control. I've had several prints ruined due to uneven coating. (Prints from different rolls.)


// Petter
Logged

Brian Gilkes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 443
    • http://www.briangilkes.com.au
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2006, 11:27:05 AM »

Quote from: PetterStahre,Apr 30 2006, 08:27 AM
I prefer HPR Satin over HPR when I need dark blacks. The downside is a more limited dynamic range (less details in shadows).
Petter,
There are a lot of canned profiles around that push down blacks by compressing shadows. I am not saying this is the case here,and I have not used this paper, but I am suggesting that you should get a good custom profile.
On your other comment I personally have found Hahnemuhle paper very consistent and free of coating faults apart from a tendency for flaking on the PhotoRag .
Cheers,
Brian Gilkes
www.pharoseditions.com.au.
Logged

PetterStahre

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
    • http://www.studiostahre.se
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2006, 04:39:46 PM »

Quote
Petter,
There are a lot of canned profiles around that push down blacks by compressing shadows. I am not saying this is the case here,and I have not used this paper, but I am suggesting that you should get a good custom profile.
Thanks but that's not the case here. I use my own custom made profiles as well as the profiles that Colorbyte makes for their RIP which I use (ImagePrint).

But when talking about profiles I've found the PhotoRag Satin profile from Hahnemuehles own page to be very strange - not to say bad/faulty. It shows some serious banding in certain colours. So custom made is the way to go.

But still the paper itself is a beauty, in my opinion.

(About Hahnemuehles general quality... I haven't experienced much flaking when printing on "standard" PhotoRag but when I've printed on their William Turner paper it has been quite a problem. WT is yet another lovely paper, but with issues... similar to an interesting but challenging relationship  )

Cheers,
Petter
Logged

Marcst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2006, 06:42:27 AM »

What I dislike about Photo Rag Satin is that the ink scruff away extremely easy. Anyone else noticed this?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up