My question is a more general formulation of a previous question about the new Epson SureColor P6000 vs. P7000, but it applies as well to the new Canon iPF ProGraph printers as well. Is gamut volume alone the only benefit of a larger ink set?
While it is easy to see the larger gamut volume that the larger ink sets provide, that additional volume encompasses only highly saturated colors at the outer edges of the gamut. But surely the gamuts of all printers have gaps and holes within the volume representing colors that are hard to achieve with the quantization from a finite number of inks and nozzles. Do the additional inks (green, blue, orange, etc) also help "fill in" these gaps within the gamut volume?
The reason I ask is that it would seem that the highly saturated colors around the extremities of the gamut volume are seldom encountered in many types of photography. While I can see these colors appearing in images that include fabrics, flowers and painted structures, it would seem like many portraits and landscapes would have few if any of these highly saturated colors. Yet I read comments that printers with larger ink sets often produce smoother and more natural skin tones. Would extra inks, for example, be of any benefit in reproducing a sunset image with smooth gradients of pastel colors?
Any informed comments and personal experiences would be helpful as I try to decide whether a few extra inks would be of any benefit to my prints, mostly landscapes without flowers.
Glenn