If I understand the situation correctly, it is simply this: 15 years of Lula's past publications on the internet are exceedingly difficult to archive and maintain successfully on today's mobile device friendly internet. Migration is necessary, but it is hugely imperfect, and fraught with difficulties that require many man-hours of human intervention. Key functionality gets lost. Relevance ranked electronic searches are fast and often efficient, but they don't truly eliminate the need or superb utility of a scholarly based index or table of contents.
All of this is a sober reminder that the digital age has not yet replicated the archival properties of past methods of information dissemination and scholarship afforded by hard copy printed newspapers, magazines, books,etc., housed redundantly at many local bricks and mortar libraries. What the older method lacked in immediate accessibility, it made up for with longevity. 15 years of LuLa publications is a mere blip on the human time scale. Decades and centuries of retrievable articles is what we had achieved with older technologies. We need to insist on the same high bar with modern media, and IMHO, we have so far not incentivized the major companies of the digital age to share these concerns about this rapid obsolescence factor.
Please don't take my remarks in any way as a criticism of the Lula staff's efforts to maintain modern up-to-date functionality. I'm going through this very issue myself with a redesign of my website on a much smaller scale. I reluctantly conclude that much of my past and present website presence was ephemeral at best... there is no easy way I can migrate my past publications on my older website to a modern google-approved mobile "responsive" web design without losing something in translation
kind regards,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com