Topic: Gold mine (Read 1271 times)

sdwilsonsct · « **on:** September 01, 2015, 04:03:56 am »

Feedback welcome.

DwayneOakes · « **Reply #1 on:** September 01, 2015, 08:40:07 am »

Great set and time of day. #1 for me for the great gold tones.
No nits from me.

Bob_B · « **Reply #2 on:** September 01, 2015, 09:36:35 am »

The rich, warm light is very effective. I also like #1.

sdwilsonsct · « **Reply #3 on:** September 03, 2015, 01:59:39 am »

Bob, Dwayne: thanks!

brandtb · « **Reply #4 on:** September 03, 2015, 10:22:20 am »

Scott - colors and tone are nice...but no real strong subjects. /B

kkerrick · « **Reply #5 on:** September 05, 2015, 10:26:58 am »

#1 is my favorite on these three. It also seems to be the most focused in terms of purpose.

Eric Myrvaagnes · « **Reply #6 on:** September 05, 2015, 03:24:05 pm »

The third has nice colors but seems otherwise fairly ordinary. The first two are really fine, IMHO. Both seem very well seen and presented. Like others I have a (slight) preference for #1, but the interactions of forms in #2 are excellent, too.

sdwilsonsct · « **Reply #7 on:** September 06, 2015, 03:32:05 pm »

Brandt, Kev, Eric -- good feedback.

Yes, strong photos usually have strong subjects. Eric, #3 is here mostly for context.

Paulo Bizarro · « **Reply #8 on:** September 07, 2015, 06:16:56 am »

#1 also for me.

Author Topic: Gold mine (Read 1271 times)

sdwilsonsct

Gold mine

DwayneOakes

Re: Gold mine

Bob_B

Re: Gold mine

sdwilsonsct

Re: Gold mine

brandtb

Re: Gold mine

kkerrick

Re: Gold mine

Eric Myrvaagnes

Re: Gold mine

sdwilsonsct

Re: Gold mine

Paulo Bizarro

Re: Gold mine