For example?
I don't know Slobodan, maybe it's the reading of the last post of the closed thread and the first page of the thread discussing whether threads should be locked for a start?
Here we go again...running to hide behind mommy's skirt.
If you want me banned, Isaac, fine... grow out of that kindergarten, be a man and say so.
Chris
Pots and kettle's may well be black but eye rolling is really not necessary, surely intent is what dictates whether a post is antagonistic? Slobodan, along with many others, bicker back and forward with no intention to resolve an issue or accept each others views as being different, it's juvenile.
Now I have a choice, I can say that a number of people were being dicks in the thread you closed and that when you start a thread to discuss moderation, the same people continue to be dicks in exactly the same manner, that would be juvenile and antagonistic so I wouldn't do that! My pointing out how people are behaving and how those posts are written with the intent to antagonise, then it's just my view of the facts, in my opinion they are being juvenile, antagonistic and writing drivel, that's what it is. My suggestion to Slobodan is rather than point out how people can avoid reading the rubbish, he and others could just stop posting the rubbish.
I don't know how best to moderate forums, that's why I don't run one! I don't envy your task but I guess it's a necessary part of running a site. Virtual lives are becoming increasingly important to people, we can all have bad days, be grumpy and argumentative at times, it's either dealt with in our personal lives or we go online and vent, that extra layer of anonymity seems to make people think it's ok to write whatever they like.
Anyway, these are my opinions, you are of course entitled not to agree with them.
Have a good week.
Mat
