Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: dead horse dead tree  (Read 2418 times)

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6365
dead horse dead tree
« on: July 16, 2015, 04:01:23 PM »

Thoughts?

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10189
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2015, 04:26:04 PM »

Very nice!

Toning seems like a LensWork recipe? Might work well in print, but I prefer something slightly less reddish.

Diego Pigozzo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 663
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2015, 05:14:25 PM »

I have to say that the composition doesn't work very well for me,
What I mean is that the tree looks too big for me and it frustrates my exploration of the background by obstructing certain features (like the "end" of the left clift and the upper part of the right river).

But, again, it's probably just my personal interests that are getting in the way.

Logged
When I grow up I want to be a photographer.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/diegopig/

Rajan Parrikar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1870
    • Rajan Parrikar
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2015, 08:49:08 PM »

Excellent image.

churly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1017
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2015, 12:17:33 AM »

Nice one Jeremy.  There is a bit of tension between the foreground and background but for this shot, it works.
Logged
Chuck Hurich

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10739
    • Echophoto
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2015, 01:43:40 AM »

Hi,

Great composition and good processing!

Best regards
Erik

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5124
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2015, 03:50:44 AM »

This certainly works for me and I agree with ErikKaffehr.

Bob_B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1583
  • Deniably plausible
    • Bob Belas Photography
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2015, 09:49:45 AM »

+1. I agree with Erik and stamper. I like the tension, and the tree with all its twisted branches is a real treat.
Logged

Arlen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 767
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2015, 08:52:21 PM »

Add one more admirer. I like this a lot.
Logged

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2837
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2015, 02:25:30 AM »

Very nice!
Logged

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6365
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2015, 02:07:27 PM »

Thanks, all. Well spotted, Slobodan: it is indeed lensworks' toning recipe. Normally I find it too much but it seemed to work here, where everything is actually pretty red.

I want to go back to Dead Horse Point. I barely even scratched the surface of its potential, and the light wasn't brilliant when I was there, after watching sunrise at Mesa Arch.

Jeremy
Logged

Hidden Grid

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
Re: dead horse dead tree
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2015, 11:52:48 PM »

Nice!
Logged
Keep your finger on the shutter and your eye on the view finder...

I need an appraiser for my work. [email protected]
Pages: [1]   Go Up