Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Save for Web  (Read 3189 times)

bobrobert

  • Guest
Save for Web
« on: February 24, 2006, 07:01:23 am »

If some one took an image say at a file size 6 MB ( my fuji 7000 jpg size fine setting 267 ppi at 10 x 8 ) and saved it for web reducing it to 100kb, would there be a difference in quality if I had taken it at the lowest jpg setting in camera ( 1MB )and saved it at the same size In other words is the jpeg compression in camera better than Photoshop or does it matter? TIA
Logged

ricwis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 159
    • http://www.ricwis.com
Save for Web
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2006, 09:44:46 am »

If I understand "Save for Web" correctly, the process optimizes the photograph for web display.  This would include converting to the sRGB color space too.

I tend to always shoot at the highest quality possible (in my case, RAW).  This allows me to have the most options with my photos.  If there is a photo I want to add to my website, I follow this workflow:
1.  Convert from RAW to a 16 bit image.
2.  Do any necessary processing and cropping.
3.  Convert to 8 bit mode.
4.  Adjust image size to 72 dpi and pixel dimensions to desired size.
5.  Save for web

Depending on quality level chosen and picture detail, I end up with a photo that is usually somewhere between 15K nd 40K.  This gives me a photo that will display well on the screen but will not print well at all, preventing someone from hijacking your work and printing copies for themselves.  It also allows faster page loading.

If I know that I am shooting a family event like a birthday party for the kids, then I will shoot in JPG mode, usually small and fine quality.  This lets me make a 4x6 print if someone wants one.  I still prepare the images for the web by converting to 72 dpi and saving for web.  Again, pages with a lot of images will load quickly.

As always, the screen shot will not show the detail of a print.
Logged
Rich Wisler
Wildlife and Scenic Photogra

Hank

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 679
Save for Web
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2006, 10:18:30 am »

I use the same sequence as Rich, and I'm happy with the results.  You are likely to find a sharp split among folks preparing images for web display.  Some hate the Save for Web feature in Photoshop, while others aren't bothered.  Results with either are so close that I use Save for Web as a matter of convenience.
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13790
Save for Web
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2006, 11:41:44 am »

In addition to what Rich and Hank said above, "Save to Web" also strip metadata from the file and set resolution to 72dpi (no resampling). I mainly use "Save to Web" to see how the JPEG compression affects image quality and to reach a certain file size (ex: 150kB).
One word of caution, "Save to Web" does not convert to sRGB, it keeps the original profile.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2006, 11:42:17 am by francois »
Logged
Francois

jani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1624
    • Øyet
Save for Web
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2006, 06:17:48 am »

Quote
One word of caution, "Save to Web" does not convert to sRGB, it keeps the original profile.
That's not entirely accurate.

It's user configurable whether you supply profile information (and what that is).

I'm mostly using regular save-as to avoid these and other problems. I used to like the preview, but it's generally just adding another time consuming step to the conversion process.
Logged
Jan

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Save for Web
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2006, 09:48:19 pm »

Rich's sequence is fine except it may be safer to reverse steps 4 and 5 so the resampling is done in high bit mode.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."
Pages: [1]   Go Up