I love that description 'quite decorative'. Is that a put down or a compliment?
Ah, Seamus, you should know me better by now. If I wanted a put down, you'd have no doubts what I meant
When taken in the context I was using it, i.e., after other compliments, it was meant as one, of course.
On a side note, I do not share such a disdain for "decorative." I believe that a lot of art works, throughout history, was meant to be decorative in the first place. The only exception might be modern arts, where "investment value," (whatever it is), or "conceptual value," (again, whatever it is), might be dominant instead.
Back to the OP photo, it has a number of elements that make it decorative, in the best sense of that word: harmonious color gamut, well-balanced distribution of shapes and forms (a.k.a. composition), etc.