Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Just Walk on Bye.  (Read 1669 times)

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Just Walk on Bye.
« on: May 26, 2015, 10:00:35 am »

Afternoon stroll.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13769
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2015, 10:42:52 am »

Love the lines and the shadow. My only problem is the halo around the woman (easily seen in the thumbnail version), is the effect intended?
Logged
Francois

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2015, 11:21:55 am »

A glowing personality?

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2015, 11:31:04 am »

Love the lines and the shadow. My only problem is the halo around the woman (easily seen in the thumbnail version), is the effect intended?

I processed this 12 years ago so I don't remember. Found it on one of my hard drives today. I like the effect and it is my "vision" of the image. :) On hindsight it looks like she is walking through what looks like a shaft of light.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2015, 11:33:04 am by stamper »
Logged

AreBee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2015, 03:21:55 pm »

Stamper,

Quote
...it looks like she is walking through what looks like a shaft of light.

If that was true the person would not be in shadow.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2015, 03:38:31 pm »

The shadow tells us the light's directly behind her.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

AreBee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2015, 03:43:37 pm »

Russ,

Quote
The shadow tells us the light's directly behind her.

If that was true the person would not be walking through a shaft of light.
Logged

brandtb

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 972
    • http://www.brandtbolding.com
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2015, 04:12:15 pm »

The
Quote
problem is the halo around the woman
...most definitely. As well, the figure and the shadow are nearly touching the frame edges?... which is not successful as there is no room for them to breathe. A thought, when you submit your image for "User Critiques"...your going to most likely get  a variety critiques about a myriad of elements in what you've submitted...and that will by it's very nature....include what may or may not have been your vision at the time...  /B
Logged
Brandt Bolding
www.brandtbolding.com

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2015, 04:29:40 pm »

Russ,

If that was true the person would not be walking through a shaft of light.

No kidding!
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #9 on: May 27, 2015, 04:48:34 am »

Love the lines and the shadow. My only problem is the halo around the woman (easily seen in the thumbnail version), is the effect intended?

The halo around the woman is in fact rim lighting something which I find attractive.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2015, 04:53:41 am »

Russ,

If that was true the person would not be walking through a shaft of light.

Rob as a Scotsman you will know Exchange square in Glasgow. She was walking north between the Goma building and the steps to the west of the building which means that the sun is directly behind her to the south. I deliberately chose to stand on the steps to capture the silhouette. Hopefully that helps?

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2015, 04:58:53 am »

The ...most definitely. As well, the figure and the shadow are nearly touching the frame edges?... which is not successful as there is no room for them to breathe. A thought, when you submit your image for "User Critiques"...your going to most likely get  a variety critiques about a myriad of elements in what you've submitted...and that will by it's very nature....include what may or may not have been your vision at the time...  /B

Thanks for the photographic lecture. There is a tight crop that takes out elements that would have spoiled the composition. The comment about vision was in reply to francois who enquired about the halo.

quote

 is the effect intended?

unquote.

AreBee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2015, 06:32:29 am »

Stamper,

Thanks for clarifying.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2015, 09:15:30 am »

The halo around the woman is in fact rim lighting something which I find attractive.

Psychologists say we tend to romanticize the past. 12 years ago you made a processing mistake, which resulted in the halo. And that is ok, years ago every single one of us was much worse at processing than we are today. It is also ok to like a mistake. We all like to post-conceptualize our intentions. But to claim it is the "fact" that it was "rim lighting"!? Seriously!?

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Just Walk on Bye.
« Reply #14 on: May 27, 2015, 09:24:29 am »

Slobodan for some reason you like to nit pick my posts for critique. Criticising clipped blacks and then posting images with clipped blacks. The motor cycle for instance. That wasn't a processing mistake in the image above. IMO you have a huge chip on your shoulder that is bigger than your photographic ability. JJJ was correct about you being the rudest man in the forum. You are now the second person that I will be ignoring.   
Pages: [1]   Go Up