Equipment & Techniques > Cameras, Lenses and Shooting gear
Canon 5Dsr hands on review
alifatemi:
http://www.cnet.com/products/canon-eos-5ds-r/
eronald:
--- Quote from: alifatemi on May 22, 2015, 09:52:59 pm ---http://www.cnet.com/products/canon-eos-5ds-r/
--- End quote ---
A disappointing review. Maybe the AA filter is too strong, the lenses not good enough?
Nikon have had more time to get their lenses in shape for hi rez.
Edmund
torger:
I would wait a while and see more tests. Canon should have good lenses. Not MFD tech cam good, but good in the 135 space.
I do not think the most jagged and aliased image is the one with better image quality. Pixelpeep should be slightly soft, ideally equally slightly soft corner to corner, that image will look great at any scale, even if rotated, perspective corrected or other applied transformations.
alifatemi:
And not to forget this is pre production model
Jack Hogan:
--- Quote from: eronald on May 23, 2015, 12:20:32 am ---A disappointing review. Maybe the AA filter is too strong, the lenses not good enough?
--- End quote ---
There is no AA in the 5DSR, or at least there is a cancelled one, like in the D800e. The D800e and the D810 show virtually the same resolution. And the Sigma 50mm Art will 'outresolve' anything that's thrown at it in the center.
Looking at linear spatial resolution from information in just the raw data of DPR's Studio Scene captures it seems that the 5DSR is every bit as sharp in the center as the D810, about 1500 lp/ph, with a touch less aliasing. The captures were taken with different 85mm lenses, as you can check there. I wonder if the tester fine tuned the lenses before conducting the test. Or perhaps the raw converter is not mature yet.
Jack
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version