Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Articles on noise in digital photography  (Read 1168 times)

BJL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6600
Articles on noise in digital photography
« on: May 14, 2015, 09:10:11 am »

There are a couple of recent articles at that other site about sources of noise in digital photography, which might be useful reading, particularly for photographers without much of a physics or enginnering background. The second in particular cites some competent co-authors: Emil Martinec, who has made many useful posts here; Eric Fossum, the inventor of the (active pixel) CMOS sensor; and Iliah Borg, author of the RawDigger software.

On photon shot noise, present in the light ariving at the camera: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8189925268/what-s-that-noise-shedding-some-light-on-the-sources-of-noise

On electronic noise sources, from within the camera: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0388507676/sources-of-noise-part-two-electronic-noise?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=mainmenu&utm_medium=text&ref=mainmenu

I suspect that there will be many quibbles and disagreements from our local experts, but these do seem to offer a good basic introduction.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2015, 02:04:42 pm by BJL »
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: Articles on noise in digital photography
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2015, 02:54:29 am »


BJL,
The problem of noise in general is a concern, whether we're referring to images, music, traffic, neighbours, meditation, and/or just getting a good night's sleep.

Noise is any unwanted and undesired stimuli, usually with an emphasis on sound, but in the case of photography, an emphasis on the visual.

I think the issue of noise in images has come to the forefront because digital processing and the computer have allowed us to examine in great detail all the technical deficiencies in our images.
With that marvelous tool, Photoshop, we can attempt to raise any dark shadow in any part of an image, to see what interesting detail might lurk there. If the detail we see is bloody banding (vertical or horizontal streaking of thin lines), or just colorful mushiness of an abstract nature, then we might become displeased. At least, I do.

I know such deficiencies might be irrelevant in a postcard-size print, and sometimes even on an A4 or A3 size print. However, for me, that's not the point. Technology is always advancing. In 10 years time, I might buy the latest 100", 8k, OLED TV screen. I'll then start reprocessing the best of my images for display at that resolution, and I don't want to see noisy crap in the shadows, or alternatively, totally black shadows devoid of detail.



Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up