Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nikon FX versus Olympus OM D... contemplating the compromises  (Read 7125 times)

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3686
Re: Nikon FX versus Olympus OM D... contemplating the compromises
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2015, 04:56:20 pm »

Dave wrote " An Oly E-M1 along with various lenses, mainly the 12–40mm
& 40–150mm f/2.8s, does most of what I want & need to do"
::
Dave, have you lost your GX7 & E-M5 (I think you once had both)?
Wouldn't they do well as back-ups/2nds in the 4/3 stable to the E-M1?
(And are both available for $500 or less 2nd-hand.)
16mpx of good quality; both bodies have stabilization, too.

:)  No, I still have and use the GX7 & E-M5. Added an E-M5ii recently as well, mainly for digitizing film in hi-res mode. I just didn't want to clutter up my post with mentions of too many different models. I left out my Sony A7r too, which in its present state—or more accurately the present state of the A7 system—is IMO still a work in progress.

-Dave-
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up