Wayne, I’m quite sure to be doing everything correctly. Basically, I’m confronted with two oddities. The first is the (sporadic) refusal for LR to print about 25% of the right-hand side of an image, which I seem to be able to cope with by not using the PRINT button.
But for the second, I haven’t found a simple solution. I simply can’t get the dimensional readout of the image layout to reflect the preview and the actual print. I need to use a pencil and paper and do the math in such a manner, that the software seemingly dictates. That mean’s, not to believe some of the readouts – finding the one to believe and the others to ignore isn’t simple.
Take a look at my example. I wanted the left, right and top borders to be 40mm. The resulting image size should fall into place and is not my real concern. I first set up the page, defining A2 paper. Then I began defining the layout, actually a simple process. What looks fine on the preview gives shows odd dimensional readout. I simply don’t believe, the top margin is only 3.2mm. And to finally achieve my goal, LR requires me to measure from the bottom of the image!
That means, I need to measure the paper, measure the image height, etc. But the readout of the image size on the preview doesn’t necessarily equal what I see – it seems to show the uncropped image, described as cell size. If my assumption is true, how does the uncropped image size help me in my layout. What I want to print is the cropped image!
I finally achieve my results (the print) but by far bot as simple as I had imagined. I’m amazed of LR seemingly ignoring false dimensions. It seems to me, that LR would want to convince me that 1 + 1 + 1 = 5.4!
Maybe I’m truly missing something here, but it can’t be too obvious and can’t be warning with proper error messages.
Wayne, have you ever printed by defining the paper size, then selecting the left, right and top margins, then allowing the image size (cell size?) to be as it may be.