Hyperfocal Table in PhotoPills (Leaf Credo 50 back)

[fotagf8]

I have a Leaf Credo 50 back.  I am using Photo Pills to calculate hyperlocal distance.  It does not have my back as an option, but it allowed me to input the data.  I described the sensor as 44 mm by 33 mm.  The program generated a CoC of .038 and a .8 crop factor.  Since I didn't input those last two numbers, I don't have 100% confidence that they are correct since the program is effectively a black box (not a criticism--I just can't see how the calculations are working).  Can anyone tell me if I have the settings right, so that I can have confidence in the output?

Thank you.

[Bart_van_der_Wolf]

I have a Leaf Credo 50 back.  I am using Photo Pills to calculate hyperlocal distance.  It does not have my back as an option, but it allowed me to input the data.  I described the sensor as 44 mm by 33 mm.  The program generated a CoC of .038 and a .8 crop factor.  Since I didn't input those last two numbers, I don't have 100% confidence that they are correct since the program is effectively a black box (not a criticism--I just can't see how the calculations are working).  Can anyone tell me if I have the settings right, so that I can have confidence in the output?

Hi,

A CoC of 0.038 (=38 micron) for a 5.3 micron pitch sensor, seems way too large for my taste. Of course, a CoC is parameter that needs to be related to output/print size and viewing distance, but still. I prefer to use a more realistic CoC, also depending on aperture used (and thus diffraction added).

Cheers,
Bart