Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10 »
 41 
 on: Today at 06:10:25 PM 
Started by nemophoto - Last post by Chris_Brown
I've used Precision Camera before. They did great work on an old 300mm I had.

http://www.precisioncamera.com/canon-camera-repair.html

 42 
 on: Today at 06:04:22 PM 
Started by Ken Tanaka - Last post by QuintaQuad
Very nice images, Michele. Lovely images on your website as well.

All the best from a fellow SW Virginian (Radford)...

 43 
 on: Today at 06:02:27 PM 
Started by Edward Starkie - Last post by amolitor
The photography and florists example is actually quite silly. It makes the whole issue seem trivial.

There are other businesses which are not awash in competition, and which offer substantially more important services. If the only dentist, doctor, grocery store, in your small town declines to serve you because you are gay (or otherwise in a recognizable but unprotected category. Veterans? Gun owners? Photographers? People who dye their hair?), you could have a much more substantial problem.

 44 
 on: Today at 06:01:07 PM 
Started by cyron123 - Last post by cyron123
Bump

 45 
 on: Today at 05:57:29 PM 
Started by petercorb - Last post by Geraldo Garcia
Unfortunately it is usual.

On my prints I can only see the marks when the light hits the paper on a specific angle and the marks usually disappear after a few days.

 46 
 on: Today at 05:53:41 PM 
Started by narikin - Last post by Geraldo Garcia
Technically the HP Z3200 wins (by a hair) on the true reds when printing on Canson Platine over the Epsons and Canons. The Epson x900 wins on the orange/yellow side by a larger margin and the Canon 8300/8400 wins on blues/purples. The difference on the reds is really not that big in favor of the Z3200 as it used to be when it was released.
As Marcin said, be realistic. No printer today will give you a red close to what you get on a wide gamut display.

 47 
 on: Today at 05:49:31 PM 
Started by jsch - Last post by Farmer
What's your vacuum set at and platen gap?

 48 
 on: Today at 05:45:44 PM 
Started by dreed - Last post by JNHenry
It's a shame that the 1/2 hour offset doesn't exist in LR...at least it didn't the last time I checked.  There are part of Australia that need it.  Plus, India and it's 1+ billion people.  Seems like a big oversight on LR's part.

 49 
 on: Today at 05:45:29 PM 
Started by Paul2660 - Last post by Gulag
as the “guy in video”, I will agree with your comment to a point. I have used those tools for many years.  But for me the LR technique is simpler, I believe faster, very effective most of the time, and of course isn’t modifying any pixels or even requiring a secondary file.

there are certainly advantages to layers and masks many times, but with pretty much everything in Photoshop/LR there are many ways to accomplish the same thing, this is an alternative which might be appealing to many.

I don't use LR because I use Photoshop CS2, which is a free download from Adobe. There is nothing wrong with your using LR to do what you need to do. But, for me,  CS2 is far better because I can do all I need to do there for free.

 50 
 on: Today at 05:44:56 PM 
Started by Chris Calohan - Last post by Chris Calohan
Not after 100,000 kids have peed, puked, screwed and dropped their waste all over it...I am not at all a Hannity fan, but watch his expose on Panama City Beach,FL and you'll see what I am talking about.

Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10 »