Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10 »
 on: Today at 12:28:37 AM 
Started by weinlamm - Last post by weinlamm
Summer-holidays are over - so now a new attempt.

If you are interested - we can speak about. It's still a fine lens.  Smiley

 on: Today at 12:26:38 AM 
Started by Schewe - Last post by aduke
My preordered copy arrived today. Grin Grin Grin


 on: Today at 12:03:47 AM 
Started by mikev1 - Last post by daws
Well-written review!

I guess the two puzzlers for me are who would want to buy this product... and who would design, build and test it and then put it on the market with all its obvious flaws.


 on: September 04, 2015, 11:48:05 PM 
Started by Schewe - Last post by Schewe
Sorry about the issue for the discount...that's way above my pay grade :~) But I'm glad you got it figured out!

 on: September 04, 2015, 11:42:41 PM 
Started by membranag - Last post by membranag
There you have a photo that you do not doubt , I can do more from any angle that there was no doubt about it!!

 on: September 04, 2015, 11:29:43 PM 
Started by membranag - Last post by membranag
I am ready to provide guarantees for sale on Ebay, you can check personally as I said in Philadelphia , or bringing to check where you say in Philadelphia ! What would you have had no doubt in my integrity !

 on: September 04, 2015, 10:59:23 PM 
Started by bundas - Last post by bundas
Double-checking on the Tamron, it's never actually listed as an EF-S, but this review does compare it to the series.
Are all APS-C intended lenses considered EF-S, even without the "S" labelling?

EF-S and third party DX lenses may not cover the full Micro Four Thirds sensor...
This is interesting to me, as it suggests that the incompatibility is not a definite fact for all such lenses. The issue seems to be in the size of a lens' image circle, but I'm still unclear about what range is compatible with my new set-up and how image circle is determined.

Edit: Interesting that B&H recommends using APSC/DX lenses with a speedbooster-equipped GH4:

 on: September 04, 2015, 10:58:43 PM 
Started by klane - Last post by klane
50mm lux sold

 on: September 04, 2015, 10:28:53 PM 
Started by Petrus - Last post by Garry Sarre
Agree Synn

I appreciate your real world comparisons. Thank you.

I see this all the time with corporate portraiture skin tones. The smaller format has this flat red smear and cutting in cyan makes a different problem. In the past with only dslr's available to me, Celtic skin required matting down with green tinted foundation in the makeup room.

MF file shows lots of different colours within the skin colour. The clarity and depth of colour shows through even at a 500 pixel webpage size.

I'll put some samples up when I get back to the studio. They are chalk and cheese.

On another note, As far as DR goes,  I was surprised after switching to MF, even with my studio portraiture, I have found I am barely within the DR capabilities of the camera - H5D-50. I have to expose as accurately as I did Transparency film. The MF CMOS solution would fix that, I just don't like the smaller size of the sensor and the puny image size through the viewfinder that the Blad and Pentax CMOS offer. I like to manual focus sometimes.

 on: September 04, 2015, 09:57:16 PM 
Started by professorbalrog - Last post by AlterEgo
OK so emphasis on the dummy over here...I'm making progress here but when I try to run step 4 (as far as I've gotten) in the ICC profile instructions, i get this error:

dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/liblcms2.2.dylib
  Referenced from: /Applications/Argyll_V1.8.0/bin/dcamprof
  Reason: image not found
Trace/BPT trap: 5

I exported from Capture one (following your directions) so I assume this step is necessary...I'm so close...I tried downloading little cms and executing the configure file but i guess that doesn't work? so close.....

you probably better off asking the author of the OSX build (Iliah) in the main dcamprof topic here...

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10 »