Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 on: Today at 10:01:43 AM 
Started by Rob C - Last post by GrahamBy
Sigh. Of course you are right about the voyeurism. And one has to respect one's natural limits: I have a facebook friend in Helsinki, ex model, blond, still quite stunning in her late 40's/early 50's. She seems to have no problem finding subjects who smile when they find her camera pointing at them. I mean Finns, smiling? It's unnatural...

 on: Today at 09:56:21 AM 
Started by Rob C - Last post by GrahamBy
Actually, I'm distorting the data... the sun is out again. Here's a rescued grab-shot that was over-expoed by at least 3 stops:

 on: Today at 09:54:24 AM 
Started by Rob C - Last post by GrahamBy
Meanwhile in Lyon...

 on: Today at 09:54:14 AM 
Started by kikashi - Last post by Chris Calohan
Gotten onto a sunset phase and not sure why....but it is an awesome sky for the subtlety of color and layering of clouds.

 on: Today at 09:53:15 AM 
Started by BernardLanguillier - Last post by Rob B.

...I am a bit at a loss as to why anyone interested in landscape would pick an Alpa over an Arca with these limitations...

I am at a bit of a loss as to why anyone considers tilt mandatory for landscape photography.

 on: Today at 09:42:33 AM 
Started by paulbk - Last post by Mark D Segal
Marcin is making a good point. I'm also finding that a number of these papers are so similar you can interchange profiles with virtually undetectable difference of results. That said, you always have the option of getting custom profiles made if you detect possible scope for improvement after trying it the free and easy way.

 on: Today at 09:33:45 AM 
Started by paulbk - Last post by Czornyj
Canson Baryta Photographique and Platine Fibre Rag

 on: Today at 09:29:46 AM 
Started by paulbk - Last post by paulbk
Looking for ICC paper profiles:
1) Paper = Epson Legacy Baryta
2) Paper = Epson Legacy Platine
Printer = Canon Pro-1000

Odd request, I know. I have the sample pack of pre-printed Epson Legacy papers and I love the look and feel of Legacy Baryta and Legacy Platine. But I have the new Canon Pro-1000 printer. What to do?

Or suggestions for "equivalent papers" with profile available for Canon Pro-1000.

 on: Today at 09:27:36 AM 
Started by PeterAit - Last post by PeterAit
I just installed a USB 3 card in my computer and connected a USB 3 docking station for my backups (I use bare hard disks for backups). Backing up using USB 2 was just too slow. The new setup is faster but I am not convinced it is as much faster as it should be. How can I test to see if I am getting the speed I should? FWIW the internal source disk is SSD. Thanks.

 on: Today at 09:12:32 AM 
Started by Rory - Last post by ButchM
Exactly. But human nature dictates not everyone will wait. Same thing happens with new camera releases and pre-orders...let others be the first to debug.

One would expect another common trait of human nature  .... the desire to do a good job ... to be more relevant in Adobe's offerings as well. Remember, one of the early selling points of CC was that new features and updates would not have to forced out the door prematurely to meet a set--in-stone deadline which was the primary cause of such problems? Or was that just a selling point to be ignored after the fact? Adobe is no longer on a hard and fast time table. They can take as much time as they choose to test more thoroughly.

If Adobe's pre-release testing was even a bit more thorough ... we subscribers wouldn't have to be relegated to pay-to-play beta testers.

I don't expect any developer to reach pure perfection, but Adobe could certainly step up their game just a bit more. The problems that have been discovered in the past several releases have been fairly wide spread and were not the result of obscure hardware configurations and/or user methodology.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10