Luminous Landscape Forum

Raw & Post Processing, Printing => Colour Management => Topic started by: Ellis Vener on April 06, 2014, 07:41:02 pm

Title: Why I still like my Eizo CG222W, even though it has 3,070 hours on it
Post by: Ellis Vener on April 06, 2014, 07:41:02 pm
I know the more more recent Eizo CG and the higher end NEC's have a larger gamut, but here's why I like my four and a half year Eizo CG222W
Title: Re: Why I still like my Eizo CG222W, even though it has 3,070 hours on it
Post by: PhilipCummins on April 07, 2014, 01:00:24 am
I guess it doesn't get much use if it's only on 3070 hours so the backlight is still in excellent condition. Some of the older LCD's I've seen have literally gone yellow from age; not sure if it's worth getting new CCFL backlights for them.
Title: Re: Why I still like my Eizo CG222W, even though it has 3,070 hours on it
Post by: Farmer on April 07, 2014, 04:41:56 pm
13.5 hours per working week average over the period - sounds like pretty reasonable use, assuming a photographer is spending time photographing the other half of the week, plus general admin and travel etc.
Title: Re: Why I still like my Eizo CG222W, even though it has 3,070 hours on it
Post by: Ellis Vener on April 09, 2014, 01:23:42 pm
The CG222W is not my primary display. I do most of my work on a 27" white LED backlit iMac (late 2009 model.)