Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => But is it Art? => Topic started by: Iluvmycam on September 19, 2013, 03:17:32 pm
-
On another photo forum I am on, a member posted this thread. Before I had time to even read or post to it it was closed.
It is a good topic, so I will open up discussion here.
runnah wrote:
This is relevant to all art forms but we will focus on photography.
So as most regulars on here will agree that overused filter packs and PS actions ruin a photo. But contrary to folks here 99% of the population loves it and buys it in droves. Most wedding photos I see have some sort to similar effect.
So are we wrong? If it is so bad than why is it so popular? Who is to say what is bad or good?
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photographic-discussions/339848-s-matter-taste.html
-
There is a difference between Fine Art and Commercial Art. Hence different needs and tastes. Phased to keep it tasteful.
Peter
-
People differ. Hence different needs and tastes.
-
What it boils down to is this: My taste is excellent, and the taste of anybody who disagrees with me is terrible.
::)
-
People wants a quick cheap results that r not normal, so with one click if they can do something different like my 4 yr old grand kid wants to with my 30+ MP w/Zeiss on it's LCD screen than they feel they r also very creative. Getting sharp, well correctly exposed image is too much hassle & forget @ PS.
All u have to do is to go 'Tunnel View' @ Yosemite and watch strangers look @ your LCD screen shot & tell u, my cheap camera takes better than your expensive one on tripod. ::) My wife kept telling me count to 10 & tripod is not a javelin. ;)
-
What it boils down to is this: My taste is excellent, and the taste of anybody who disagrees with me is terrible.
::)
This is a very common way of thinking, nothing new but you summarised it perfectly :(
-
This is a very common way of thinking, nothing new but you summarised it perfectly :(
And that's because it is perfect!
Rob C
-
If it is so bad than why is it so popular?
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photographic-discussions/339848-s-matter-taste.html
The curmudgeon in me wants to reply "it is so popular because it is bad," but I know that's not really true. However, using food as an analogy, look at the immense popularity of McDonalds, Domino Pizza, and other chains that serve terrible food.
-
The curmudgeon in me wants to reply "it is so popular because it is bad," but I know that's not really true. However, using food as an analogy, look at the immense popularity of McDonalds, Domino Pizza, and other chains that serve terrible food.
Don't be afraid to say it:
The Lowest Common Denominator.
;-)
Rob C
-
However, using food as an analogy, look at the immense popularity of McDonalds, Domino Pizza, and other chains that serve terrible food.
Cheap fast cooked-food without shopping, without a kitchen, without utensils; somewhere warm and clean and dry.
But wasn't the topic something frivolous -- why people might like one style of photography more than another?
-
There is a difference between Fine Art and Commercial Art
The Lowest Common Denominator
It might be said that those who frequent sites as ours do tend to fall outside that LCD range and more toward the Fine Art appreciation direction.
-
It might be said that those who frequent sites as ours do tend to fall outside that LCD range and more toward the Fine Art appreciation direction.
It isn't about the membership of a particular forum - it's a measure of life in general.
Rob C
-
Bud Light is the top selling beer in the US........There's no accounting for taste.
-
There's no accounting for anything until you make some effort to understand what explanations there might be.
-
There's no accounting for anything until you make some effort to understand what explanations there might be.
And then there are those that are visual nomads.
Peter
-
What it boils down to is this: My taste is excellent, and the taste of anybody who disagrees with me is terrible.
::)
That is the POV of a narrow minded arrogant artist which I am quite capable of myself. When I am more humble and conscious, I try and ask of all art "what do you have to teach me?". More often than not the answer is not much or nothing, but in asking that question I give all art a chance. Sometimes.........sometimes I learn something important and sometimes........I learn to love art that I perviously despised.
-
And then there are those that are visual nomads.
And your opaque epigrams might be placeholders for some interesting ideas, which you don't take care to communicate.
-
And your opaque epigrams might be placeholders for some interesting ideas, which you don't take care to communicate.
Huh?
-
What it boils down to is this: My taste is excellent, and the taste of anybody who disagrees with me is terrible.
::)
+1
-
What it boils down to is this: My taste is excellent, and the taste of anybody who disagrees with me is terrible.
::)
My view exactly, but do not forget that if something good becomes popular, then it somehow becomes less good.
-
My view exactly, but do not forget that if something good becomes popular, then it somehow becomes less good.
Wonder if thats why there such a negative view amongst some that nothing is good anymore?
-
I wonder if we can divide this subject up a little to throw some more light on the matter.
We have taste about something or some action taken which we might simplify down to be discussed as the subject.
The subject can be created by a person/s or as the result of human actions OR
it can be created by nature, God call the process what you will.
I can't fathom the intentions of nature or God however I do think the intentions of the creator of a 'subject' is part of the taste equation.
I suspect but can't prove that the motivation of people who create 'subject' matter which others approve or disapprove of has changed, or at least the % of 'subject' matter that is created, to say "look at what I have done, pay me some attention" has increased - sometimes it is just about money but I think the social media process demonstrates the cry for personal attention that occurs where money is not involved.
Is this just a modern channel for something that has always existed?
Maybe or maybe we have become more desirous of individual attention and less happy to be just part of the tribe/village etc.
This post may be just written to prove the point.
-
Why do we need taste as long as we can sell it?
-
Why do we need taste as long as we can sell it?
I checked out your images - very appealing images - my favourite - "Little Planet" very engaging image.
Mal
-
I checked out your images - very appealing images - my favourite - "Little Planet" very engaging image.
Mal
Thanks - its appreciated, though I have to admit the little planet is just a "me too" thing I tried once.
Cheers
~Chris
-
Thanks - its appreciated, though I have to admit the little planet is just a "me too" thing I tried once.
Cheers
~Chris
Chris
I think uniqueness is mostly delusion - few people achieve it - most just think they have.
I aim for relevant and leave the phantasy to others.
I for one liked your "me too" image - well done, I say.
Mal
-
I sort of am oriented more towards identity than uniqueness.
I try to do my thing and not force myself to be original.
I personally believe this pays back on the long run.
And yes ... trying to have fun doing that!
Cheers
~Chris
-
My view exactly, but do not forget that if something good becomes popular, then it somehow becomes less good.
Or if it becomes popular it wasn't that good to begin with.
-
Or if it becomes popular it wasn't that good to begin with.
Just because something may not appeal to you, does not make it bad.