Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Computers & Peripherals => Topic started by: OldRoy on May 18, 2013, 12:55:46 pm

Title: Win 7 and .ORF files
Post by: OldRoy on May 18, 2013, 12:55:46 pm
Not for the first time I today downloaded the MS codec pack, (16.4.1734.1104) 64 bit version and ran it. It correctly identified that the codecs were already present and offered the "repair" option. On completion I rebooted and, to no surprise at all, discovered that the .ORF RAWS were still seen as generic icons: this almost a year after my first attempt.

Anyone managed to get this to work?

How I hate using 3rd party cataloguing facilities (LR, I'm looking at you) when I've had half a lifetime of managing huge numbers of files via the OS.

Roy
Edited: Wasn't sure whether this might belong in the DAM board.
Edited again. Possible conflict with Olympus Viewer resources? Lightroom?
Title: Re: Win 7 and .ORF files
Post by: Vladimirovich on May 18, 2013, 02:21:33 pm
How I hate using 3rd party cataloguing facilities (LR, I'm looking at you) when I've had half a lifetime of managing huge numbers of files via the OS.
what is wrong with 3rd party apps that behave just like windows explorer for that matter ? like xnview (free) and similar... then there are paid codec packs if you are so adamant about using explorer = like http://www.fastpictureviewer.com/codecs/
Title: Re: Win 7 and .ORF files
Post by: OldRoy on May 18, 2013, 02:49:19 pm
what is wrong with 3rd party apps that behave just like windows explorer for that matter ? like xnview (free) and similar... then there are paid codec packs if you are so adamant about using explorer = like http://www.fastpictureviewer.com/codecs/
Thanks for this utterly useless, pointless non-contribution.
You wouldn't like to hear what I'm thinking right now. Is there an "ignore" option on LL?

Roy
Title: Re: Win 7 and .ORF files
Post by: Vladimirovich on May 18, 2013, 09:47:35 pm
Thanks for this utterly useless, pointless non-contribution.
You wouldn't like to hear what I'm thinking right now. Is there an "ignore" option on LL?

Roy
yawn...