Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Digital Cameras & Shooting Techniques => Topic started by: MrSmith on April 13, 2013, 09:49:35 am

Title: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: MrSmith on April 13, 2013, 09:49:35 am
I have noticed this trend recently of over sharpening to the point of nasty artifacts and smooth areas taking on an orange peel effect. Why do people do this? Particularly amateurs with images that only get viewed on the web.
Can they not see what they are doing to their images?

I do a small amount of sharpening at output* depending on lens used then leave it up to the client to sharpen for their intended use as sharpening for print will mean the image is too gritty for small web use.

*usually just the normal/soft look from the old capture one in C1-7
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: PeterAit on April 13, 2013, 10:15:44 am
I suspect it's two things  -  at least. One is the overemphasis on sharpness in photographs, the "sharper is always better" mantra that, while widely believed, is of course false. Then there are less knowledgeable photographers who don't understand that sharpening can be overdone to the point of the kinds of artifacts you describe. "Hey, if LR lets me slide the sharpness control all the way over, it must be OK!"
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: hjulenissen on April 13, 2013, 12:32:17 pm
perhaps their camera or some web-based scaling does this by default?
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Schewe on April 13, 2013, 01:52:25 pm
I have noticed this trend recently of over sharpening to the point of nasty artifacts and smooth areas taking on an orange peel effect. Why do people do this?

Because they don't have a clue how to sharpening properly...
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: petermfiore on April 13, 2013, 01:58:40 pm
Because they don't have a clue how to sharpening properly...

And that's the truth.


Peter
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: PhotoEcosse on April 13, 2013, 03:16:04 pm
Given that you suggest that the culprits are those whose images you say "only get used on the web", then that may be a large part of the answer. We all know that no normal computer monitor is capable of displaying a photograph well (in any meaningful sense) but I suspect that you are correct that many photographs never get printed.

For those that do, however, I further suspect that many of the images that we see on web pages and in chatrooms like this are Jpeg versions of photographs that may have been correctly sharpened for the production of a large print, but then compressed for the web in a way that caricatures the sharpening.

Certainly I agree that many of the images that get posted here do look grossly over-sharpened and also over-saturated. But that may not be how they look when outputted to print as the authors intended.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: digitaldog on April 13, 2013, 03:20:52 pm
If you over-sharpen an image visually, then back off, the result is, the image looks less sharp. That fools the brain. I think the trend is to go the other way hence over sharpening. But the bigger issue is sharpening visually for any output other than to the screen is fraught with issues! What looks butt ugly on-screen can look fantastic on output. WYS isn't WYG.

http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/20357.html
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Bart_van_der_Wolf on April 13, 2013, 07:01:47 pm
I have noticed this trend recently of over sharpening to the point of nasty artifacts and smooth areas taking on an orange peel effect. Why do people do this?

Two reasons;

I'm not trying to be a Smart Aleck here, this is serious. Nothing is stopping them, so why would they?
The follow-up question then becomes; If they knew when to stop, would they?

Quote
Can they not see what they are doing to their images?

Actually, that's part of the issue. When is enough, enough? The sharpening tool will not warn you, not how much more is needed, and not how much it is overdone. It could, but it doesn't. So we'll have to do it by eye, and we're really not that good in pinpointing the optimum setting by eye. One can gain experience by trying, but maybe that is not such an efficient method to find out.

Let's address the issue in an analytical way.

The maximum possible sharpness, without artifacts, is reached when two adjacent pixels (or an edge) jump(s) exactly from the minimum possible brightness to the maximum possible brightness, e.g. from 0 to 255 in an 8-bit channel. That assumes the original subject was such a sharp edge, with maximum contrast. No smooth transition, just an abrupt jump. That is only possible when these pixels or edges happen to be aligned exactly with the pixel grid. If we were to shift the image half a pixel, then the edge transition of brightness would go from 0% to 50% to 100%. That's consistent with the Shannon/Nyquist principle, that it takes more than 2 pixels to reliably reconstruct 1 cycle (~line-pair). Therefore the brightness of pixels on a slanted edge would transition from 0% to 100% depending on the contribution ratio of both pixels across the edge.

Natural images (taken with lenses, area averaging sensels, and demosaicing) will not be able to make such a steep transition, there will be a very slightly gradual transition. That transition (AKA Edge Spread Function or ESF) is at best equal to a Gaussian blur with radius 0.323, as plotted in the following chart:
 
(http://bvdwolf.home.xs4all.nl/temp/LuLa/MaxSharp01.png)

Now, when we know that the theoretically best possible artifact free sharpness corresponds to a Gaussian blur of 0.323, then we can determine the maximum possible contrast between any pixel and its neighbor. For that we could take a single white pixel, say RGB[255,255,255], on a black background RGB[0,0,0], and blur (convolve) that with a 0.323 Gaussian blur (Point Spread Function, PSF).

That will set the central pixel to 196.7591, and its brightest neighbors to 13.6177, or a ratio of 14.45:1 for a horizontal / vertical neighbor. That is therefore the highest possible per pixel contrast, anything more is a signal that it is over-sharpened. That is for a perfectly aligned per pixel contrast, which will be halved when the edge falls exactly halfway two pixels. Therefore the optimal sharpness-zone is between a per pixel contrast of 7.23:1 and 14.45:1, but never more than the latter.

That should make it relatively easy for a modern software producer to create a signal zone in their sharpening dialog that indicates optimal/over sharpening. Unfortunately they instead seem to be hibernating (or worse).

For printed output, one might want to over-sharpen a bit at the native printing resolution, to pre-compensate for diffusion losses in the output medium and/or due to the specific printing technology.

Cheers,
Bart
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: louoates on April 13, 2013, 08:06:00 pm
I agree that most folks use the wrong tools for sharpening or have no idea how to use the tools they have. Lots of art show photographers have been pushed into bigger and bigger canvas prints to keep up with the competition and thus are using way too much enlarging for the pixels available. Rather than learning how to up-res properly they try the sharpening route with predictably poor results.

You can't sharpen correctly for your output printing by using your monitor. Here's the foolproof way: Nik Sharpening tools. Use Nik Presharpener for screen viewing. That's where you can use your monitor to judge what it will look like on someone else's monitor. But if you are going to print it, use Nik's Output sharpener. Use their defaults for whatever paper or canvas you will be using. I guarantee it'll look like crap on your monitor. Print it anyway. If you're like me, you'll throw away your previous prints. Yes, it's that good. Yes, it's that easy. No, I don't work for Nik or Google. Yes, there are other sharpening tools out there but I see no need for me to bother with testing them.
  It took me a few months to get the courage to print my first Nik Output sharpened image despite how lousy it looked on my Eizo monitor.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ray on April 13, 2013, 08:54:22 pm
Mrs Smith,

The question can't be satisfactorily answered without reference to specific images. People post images for different reasons. Some post images of themselves to declare that they are, or were, at a particular location. "Look at me! Look at me! Aren't I cool!"

For such images, 'pop' is more desired than appropriate sharpening, and the occasional blown highlight and/or blocked shadow is of no concern.

Others post images to demonstrate how sharp their new lens or camera can be,  but without a comparison of the identical scene shot with another lens or camera with an equally appropriate amount of sharpening applied, showing 100% crops, no firm conclusions can be reached about the resolving merits of the new lens or camera. An image from a P&S camera can look as as sharp as the same scene shot with 40mp MFDB, at a particular print size.

If one is exploring the potential of one particular aspect of lens performance, such as resolving power, then it should be no surprise that one would attempt to extract the maximum amount of detail from any test images, which of course requires serious sharpening. If it so happens that other parts of the image which contain little or no detail, and which should be smooth, are adversely affected by the sharpening, it is of no consequence in relation to the purpose of the exercise, but it would be of consequence if such images had been processed for sale and exhibition. In such cases one would be advised to selectively sharpen certain parts of the image that contain detail whilst protecting other areas that have no detail.

Likewise, if one were exploring the potential of a new design of sensor to produce clean shadows, and comparing that quality with another design of sensor, one would probably shoot images of the same very high contrast scene with both cameras, then raise the shadows till the noise became apparent in both images, so that one could clearly see the noise, not because one likes to see noise, but in order to compare the degree of noise. However, if one were processing such images for sale or to hang on one's wall, one would certainly not want to see noisy shadows.

Hope I've clarified this for you.  ;)
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: hjulenissen on April 14, 2013, 02:38:51 am
Sharpening, like saturation, contrast and other parameters seems to be ones where the public wants "larger than life", while some purists wants "realistic" values. Is this not a general social mechanism in which the "masses" want to make sure that their friends get the message, while the elites wants to distinguish themselves from the masses by using more subtle cues that takes another member of the elite to recognize?

-h
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on April 14, 2013, 03:12:35 am
Downscaling to web size images is a bit tricky. I guess LR makes a good job of it.

Best regards
Erik


I have noticed this trend recently of over sharpening to the point of nasty artifacts and smooth areas taking on an orange peel effect. Why do people do this? Particularly amateurs with images that only get viewed on the web.
Can they not see what they are doing to their images?

I do a small amount of sharpening at output* depending on lens used then leave it up to the client to sharpen for their intended use as sharpening for print will mean the image is too gritty for small web use.

*usually just the normal/soft look from the old capture one in C1-7
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: marcmccalmont on April 15, 2013, 12:22:40 am
I think MrSmith is referring to an image that Ray posted under "Zooms or Primes" I like Ray and he is a good photographer My guess is he oversharpened w/o viewing the image downscaled for the web. We are all human and I'm the first to admit my mistakes, I make quite a few! LuLa is usually a civilized forum so Mr Smith if you have a personal issue with someone please take it off line. I'm glad you did bring up the topic because of it I will try the Nik sharpening software! And I'd like to thank Ray for his post I learned how good the Nikkor 85mm 1.8 lens really is.
Marc
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: MrSmith on April 15, 2013, 03:57:11 am
Absolutely nothing personal against any LuLa member and the posts/thread you refer to was a cordial one without venom. And those images were crops to show the sharpness differences in 2 particular lenses not finished portfolio pieces.

My opening post refers to a trend I have noticed growing over time which people seem happy to comment on, I expect they can think of many instances where they have noticed this trend.

As you were.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ray on April 15, 2013, 06:22:41 am
I think MrSmith is referring to an image that Ray posted under "Zooms or Primes" I like Ray and he is a good photographer My guess is he oversharpened w/o viewing the image downscaled for the web. We are all human and I'm the first to admit my mistakes, I make quite a few! LuLa is usually a civilized forum so Mr Smith if you have a personal issue with someone please take it off line. I'm glad you did bring up the topic because of it I will try the Nik sharpening software! And I'd like to thank Ray for his post I learned how good the Nikkor 85mm 1.8 lens really is.
Marc

Not a problem, Marc, but thanks for your support. However, I  did also wonder if Mr Smith was directing his question mainly at me for oversharpening those recent lens-comparison images, but apparently he wasn't. The fact is, when doing such comparisons I'll try various degrees of sharpening in order to get a better practical perspective on the significance of such differences.

Whilst the resolution differences in the centre of many of my test shots are not that significant with D800E, which probably motivated me to oversharpen them in search of visible differences, I'm now seeing a noticeably greater difference in the centre when comparing the two lenses on the D7100, but not so great a difference at the edges of course.

Cheers!
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: kers on April 15, 2013, 08:58:10 am
Sharpening is one reason why i like to control my output; I have a large format printer so can do some trail and error searching for the best possible sharpening - i Like.
I have always liked to control the photographic process from start to finnish.
If i send images to magazines i have a standard procedure and check the outcome when i get my copy. Accordingly i make adjustments...
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Les Sparks on April 15, 2013, 11:48:41 am
Optimum sharpening is hard. There is no good soft proof for sharpening. As Bart points out the sharpening tools don't say do more do less or whoa.
Part of the problem is defining optimum sharpening what does an optimum sharpened image look like--especially a optimum sharpened print. Back 100 years or so ago when I printed color negatives I never got good results until I finally saw one of my negatives printed by a great printer and found out what a good print was. From then on it was easy to get good results. I had a target. I think the same holds with sharpening. Once you see one of your images printed with optimum sharpening, the light goes on, and you know what the target is.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ellis Vener on April 16, 2013, 11:18:43 am
Why do people oversharpen?
The simplest and truest answer: ignorance.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ben Rubinstein on April 16, 2013, 12:24:49 pm
I think we would also need to define what 'over sharpening' is, what is over sharp for some is good sharpening for another. I remember when canon came out with what they considered was optimum capture sharpening for the 1DsII at the time, USM 300,0.3,0 and the forums were full of people saying just how OTT that amount was. Once we can define what is correct sharpening we can work out who to point a finger at. Until that point and given that like colour it's a matter of taste anyway, perhaps we can just carry on with our lives?
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: MrSmith on April 16, 2013, 02:34:38 pm
I'm talking about creating detail that isn't there like the aforementioned orange peel effect that is artefacts from over sharpening.
 I don't worry about other peoples images so I can carry on with my life without getting anxious about them  ::) but wondered what was the thinking behind the phenomenon.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on April 16, 2013, 08:21:13 pm
Hi,

I would be much interested on your take of the four images below. They are taken from a discussion thread started by "Chrismuc" who's images are used.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=73668.0

I would suggest checking the enclosed images before reading the thread,

Best regards
Erik
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ray on April 16, 2013, 08:40:11 pm
Why do people oversharpen?
The simplest and truest answer: ignorance.

That's not a particularly helpful answer, Ellis. Ignorance is an unavoidable part of the human condition. One could say, there are only two types of people; those who know they are ignorant and those who don't know they are ignorant. One could also say that those who know they are ignorant are less ignorant than those who don't know they are ignorant.  ;)
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ray on April 16, 2013, 08:47:54 pm
I'm talking about creating detail that isn't there like the aforementioned orange peel effect that is artefacts from over sharpening.
 I don't worry about other peoples images so I can carry on with my life without getting anxious about them  ::) but wondered what was the thinking behind the phenomenon.

In a sense, you've answered your own question, Mr Smith. The oversharpening you seem to be referring to are artefacts. I don't believe anyone deliberately oversharpens in order to create artifacts, unless perhaps if he's attempting to create an abstract image consisting of exaggerated sharpening artifacts. Anything goes in the name of art.

Any tendency to oversharpen parts of the image where artefacts are not noticeable, or less noticeable, would be due to peoples' general fascination with the continually increasing resolution possible from the most recent developments in digital camera technology.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: hjulenissen on April 17, 2013, 02:10:08 am
I think we would also need to define what 'over sharpening' is, what is over sharp for some is good sharpening for another. I remember when canon came out with what they considered was optimum capture sharpening for the 1DsII at the time, USM 300,0.3,0 and the forums were full of people saying just how OTT that amount was. Once we can define what is correct sharpening we can work out who to point a finger at. Until that point and given that like colour it's a matter of taste anyway, perhaps we can just carry on with our lives?
I would believe that objective criteria for sharpening can be established for capture sharpening and print sharpening. E.g. "compensate for high-frequency losses in capture/print with the goal of a flat, wide passband while avoiding excessive noise amplification". This is similar, I believe, to the goals of deconvolution.

For artistic sharpening, there is of course no objective goal.

-h
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: hjulenissen on April 17, 2013, 02:13:03 am
I'm talking about creating detail that isn't there like the aforementioned orange peel effect that is artefacts from over sharpening.
...
This might be arguing over semantics, but I believe that sharpening cannot "create detail that isn't there". It can accentuate detail that is very faint (such as skin pores or noise).

-h
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: torger on April 17, 2013, 08:27:41 am
It's the same reason that leica and medium format users think that being without AA filter is an advantage, they like fake detail ;D

Not being a printing or sharpening wizard or anything, I've noted that oversharpening the files a bit for my C-prints is beneficial for high PPIs, as the C-print is quite rounded and even it out, but really it only makes a difference on nosing distance so if I'd skip sharpening all-together and just work with global/local contrast it would not make much difference.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ben Rubinstein on April 17, 2013, 09:07:42 am
It's the same reason that leica and medium format users think that being without AA filter is an advantage, they like fake detail ;D

Not being a printing or sharpening wizard or anything, I've noted that oversharpening the files a bit for my C-prints is beneficial for high PPIs, as the C-print is quite rounded and even it out, but really it only makes a difference on nosing distance so if I'd skip sharpening all-together and just work with global/local contrast it would not make much difference.

I think that was my point, I find artefacts ugly however they are created and why there are those who would volunteer to have such artefacts by shooting a Leica M or Fuji X-MOS sensor escapes me, however I realise that there are many to whom such artefacts are a plus of 'sharpness'. It's just too subjective is it not?
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: MrSmith on April 17, 2013, 09:13:56 am
"I would be much interested on your take of the four images below."

after a very quick look, top right looks fine to me, bottom right is OTT, others are passable but still too much for me personally but possibly fine for their intended use (whatever that is)
not got the time to look at the thread.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Rob C on April 17, 2013, 02:24:43 pm
Sharpening, like saturation, contrast and other parameters seems to be ones where the public wants "larger than life", while some purists wants "realistic" values. Is this not a general social mechanism in which the "masses" want to make sure that their friends get the message, while the elites wants to distinguish themselves from the masses by using more subtle cues that takes another member of the elite to recognize?

-h



Ah, those pearls cast before swine!

;-)

Rob C
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on April 17, 2013, 03:10:17 pm
Hi,

Those images were from four different cameras:

2002: Contax N Digital (6 MP Philips CCD sensor w/ AA-filter, @ ISO25) + Contax N 100f2.8 Macro @ f8
2006: Leica R8 DMR (10 MP Kodak CCD sensor w/o AA-filter, @ ISO100) + Leica R 60f2.8 Macro @ f5.6
2009: Canon 5DII (21 MP Canon CMOS sensor w/ AA-filter, @ ISO 100) + Zeiss ZE 100f2 Macro @ f8
2011: Contax 645 IQ180 (80 MP Dalsa CCD sensor w/o AA-filter, @ ISO 50) + Zeiss Contax 645 140f2.8 @ f11

Downsized to 6 MP.

Your order was:

Fine: IQ180
OK: Canon 5DII and Contax N digital
OTT: Leica R8 DMR

My order was:

Best: Canon 5DII
Next best: IQ 180
Next next best: Contax N
OTT: Leica DMR

When I did the comparison I did not know which camera was which, but knew there was an IQ180, a DMR and a Contax N but didn't know about the Canon.

Best regards
Erik



"I would be much interested on your take of the four images below."

after a very quick look, top right looks fine to me, bottom right is OTT, others are passable but still too much for me personally but possibly fine for their intended use (whatever that is)
not got the time to look at the thread.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: xpatUSA on April 18, 2013, 01:48:48 am
My take is a slow diminution of subtlety in our lives. We see it not only in over-sharpened images but also in highly saturated colors being de rigeur, redder than red sunsets, Foveon blue skies, cars covered with bling, grown men with stupid "little boy" haircuts, women with primary colored lipstick, movies where you know the plot and the ending after the first few frames have clattered past the arc lamp . . . I think I'd better stop now . . .

Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: hjulenissen on April 18, 2013, 06:16:38 am
Why is it that connoisseurs of cinema seems to prefer jumpy, non-realistic 24fps movement, while the general public prefers realistic 48fps+ movement?

Does connoisseurs of still-image photography prefer the realistic(?) sharpening of a flat passband, or the unrealistic aliasing of no OLPF? Or does still-image connoisseurs prefer the aliasing of no OLPF while the general public prefers the artifacts of overdone sharpening?

-h
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Bryan Conner on April 20, 2013, 01:22:19 am
I think that some people tend to post images immediately after they very quickly made adjustments on their computer, on their cell/mobile/tablet and post it for the world to see.  If they would wait a day or even an hour or so then revisit the image with fresh eyes, they probably would make further changes.  I think it boils down to a lack of patience.  They want more...stronger....and they want it now!  They drag some sliders, click a button or two, upload it and they never see it again.  They have moved on to their next masterpiece.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ellis Vener on April 21, 2013, 11:30:27 am
"That's not a particularly helpful answer, Ellis. Ignorance is an unavoidable part of the human condition."

It may be an unavoidable condition but it is curable. What we (I  am using the collective pronoun to describe the community of  who have figured their way of ignorance in this matter) suffer from is that quite often  the sharing of the cure (what we know) very often gets bogged down in the technical weeds of the algorithms when trying to explain the hows of why  over-sharpening is happening,  which just makes the message fly over most people's heads.

The solution needs to be better explained in language ( both words and pictures) that non-engineers can more easily comprehend. Bruce Fraser and Jeff Schewe have done much of the hard slogging and heavy lifting to move the discussion in a more comprehensible direction.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Ray on April 22, 2013, 09:36:50 am
The solution needs to be better explained in language ( both words and pictures) that non-engineers can more easily comprehend. Bruce Fraser and Jeff Schewe have done much of the hard slogging and heavy lifting to move the discussion in a more comprehensible direction.

I would tend to agree with that, Ellis. What's missing in this discussion are examples of oversharpened images. One can't get very far with just words when discussing pictures.

My impression is that many pictures that appear oversharpened are actually oversharpened only in certain parts of the image due to a lack of selective sharpening. There is also the issue of monitor size and resolution that can affect the appearance of sharpening. A large but low resolution monitor will display a much larger image at 100% than a small, high resolution monitor, and as a consequence any sharpening artifacts will be magnified on the large, low resolution monitor.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Hening Bettermann on April 22, 2013, 08:46:35 pm
Hi Erik

Your screen shots are labeled A,B,C,D. I can not relate this to 2001,2006,2009,2011.

A (bottom right) stands out by the sharpness of the background. Obviously due to smaller aperture, since sharpness in front is roughly the same as on the others.
B (top right) has a purple cast, compared to the others, and falls out by that
C (bottom left) and D (top left) look pretty much the same to me.

I would be curious which one is the 5D2...
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: indusphoto on April 24, 2013, 11:01:43 pm
Why does it matter? An artist or a novice takes images for personal expression, and a photographer takes images for client's pleasure. If viewer does not like it, then viewer be damned (unless viewer is the one paying). So I think the simple answer is that people "oversharpen" because people like it (be they producers or buyers).

In my opinion there is really no right or wrong here.  People use a lot of other artifacts like over exposure, under exposure, lens flare, out of focus areas in their images. In fact, out of focus artifact has become so fashionable that we have a name for it; bokeh!

The appropriate question may be what is appropriate sharpening for me on this image.
 

Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on April 24, 2013, 11:27:07 pm
Hi Henning,

Here is the original thread: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=73668.0

D: Canon 5DII
B: Phase One IQ180
C: Contax N
A: Leica DMR


Best regards
Erik


Hi Erik

Your screen shots are labeled A,B,C,D. I can not relate this to 2001,2006,2009,2011.

A (bottom right) stands out by the sharpness of the background. Obviously due to smaller aperture, since sharpness in front is roughly the same as on the others.
B (top right) has a purple cast, compared to the others, and falls out by that
C (bottom left) and D (top left) look pretty much the same to me.

I would be curious which one is the 5D2...

Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: MarkL on April 25, 2013, 08:02:24 am
So they get 'omg that lens is so sharp' on their 800px jpgs posted on forums?

Really I think it is just the same as the oversaurated pictures, the super tone mapped pictures, the 'sky is darker than the foreground' landscapes, the b&w landscapes with so much contrast they look like the face of the moon, the ambient-3-stops-underexposed flash shots etc.

It is a case of taste and restraint.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Jason DiMichele on April 25, 2013, 11:16:26 am
Here are my 2 cents:

1) MrSmith, just curious as to why you wouldn't do a small amount of sharpening on your files regardless of lens used

2) While thinking of all the visual scars of some of the outrageously hideous images that gave/has given HDR it's bad rap, it's a scary thought to think that perhaps some people like the garish over sharpening. There's no way that the people who abused HDR couldn't tell that it looked fake. Perhaps they don't mind the over sharpening. There's a lot to be said for taste/bad taste.

3) It's possible that some individuals are using batch processing with settings that should only work for a few of their images and yet are applied to all (for example some of their images are interpolated to a large size and some small jpgs).

4) People are bombarded by overly saturated images in the media all the time and maybe some people think that the sharpening is adding "punch".

5) Lots of people just don't pay attention to details because they can't or don't. A man on a galloping horse as they say.

In my opinion subtlety goes a long way.

Cheers,
Jay
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: MrSmith on April 25, 2013, 03:09:06 pm
Here are my 2 cents:

1) MrSmith, just curious as to why you wouldn't do a small amount of sharpening on your files regardless of lens used


Cheers,
Jay

I don't turn the sharpening off, usually use the 'image version 3' soft or standard setting in c1 depending on lens. This way the client can then sharpen for intended output, a web jpeg or poster would require totally different sharpening.
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: Jason DiMichele on April 26, 2013, 01:07:15 pm
I don't turn the sharpening off, usually use the 'image version 3' soft or standard setting in c1 depending on lens. This way the client can then sharpen for intended output, a web jpeg or poster would require totally different sharpening.

Ok, got it! :) I'm not familiar with C1 but was just curious about your workflow. Thanks for clarifying!

Cheers,
Jay
Title: Re: Why do people oversharpen?
Post by: FredBGG on April 26, 2013, 01:40:02 pm
Why does it matter? An artist or a novice takes images for personal expression, and a photographer takes images for client's pleasure. If viewer does not like it, then viewer be damned (unless viewer is the one paying). So I think the simple answer is that people "oversharpen" because people like it (be they producers or buyers).

In my opinion there is really no right or wrong here.  People use a lot of other artifacts like over exposure, under exposure, lens flare, out of focus areas in their images. In fact, out of focus artifact has become so fashionable that we have a name for it; bokeh!

The appropriate question may be what is appropriate sharpening for me on this image.
 


Very well said. I could not agree more.
It is a subjective choice.

That said it does take a bit of self control to not get carried away.
Also many upload services such as flickr add sharpening