Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: John Rodriguez on February 10, 2013, 09:17:19 am
-
Constructive criticism always welcome.
(http://johnrodriguez.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v75/p1423572504-5.jpg)
-
What is the shutter speed, please ?!
For me the result is interresting as it's different of other works that use fairly long 5 to 30 sec shutter speed !
But slightly overexposed for me.
-
Thanks. I generally don't blur water unless I need to in order to emphasize the main subject.
I don't remember the shutter speed, probably somewhere around 1/15ish around f/22. I need to rescan, the chrome has texture in all the highlights.
-
I've looked at this a couple of times now and it's not the highlights in the water that are a problem as there is some texture there. To my eyes, there are too many competing elements - bright water, bright rock and bright plants - and they don't seem to work together. Viewers are subliminally drawn tot he brightest parts first but there is no natural connection between these elements.
-
I was trying to tie together the plant, main rock and foreground rocks, however that diagonal is opposite the flow of the stream. Here's another version with that work taken out.
(http://johnrodriguez.zenfolio.com/img/s2/v70/p1425368868-5.jpg)
-
I prefer the first version, more dynamic !!
Perhaps, just little touch of brush to recover some highlights, but good overall.
Thierry
-
I'm calibrated and all the water textures show up just fine.
What does work better to my eye composition wise, is eliminating the foreground rocks.
David
-
Well, since everyone gets an opinion, I like the two 2/3 or so of the image, but I could do without the bottom. I find it distracts with the main stream and creates competition for the eye.
Mike.
-
Do you find the plant, main rock and foreground rocks, interesting -- or is this an exercise in technique?
I find the overall scene and lighting interesting, with particular emphasis on the main rock, the plant and the light on the foreground rocks. The diagonal I had added was more of an exercise/experiment (I'm doing homework for a printing workshop I'm attending in a couple of months). The image you see at the top of the post has changed several times during the course of this thread, the diagonal contrast increase I referenced is no longer present. While there's still some room for improvement, I'm fairly happy with where it's at currently - the eye is drawn initially to the rapids and the main rock then wanders to the plant then eventually down to the light on the rocks.
-
Well, since everyone gets an opinion, I like the two 2/3 or so of the image, but I could do without the bottom. I find it distracts with the main stream and creates competition for the eye.
Mike.
Someting like that ?!
I think you are right Mike, it looks better to my eyes too !
-
too much cropped off ! It need to be cropped right above the bottom rocks.Doing so draws the eye first to the big rock then clockwise with the flow of the water, around to the right.