Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Jeremy Roussak on December 28, 2012, 01:33:35 pm
-
Comments?
Jeremy
-
I see it as "stripe" to the point of loosing the creek in the foreground. "Stripes" are down the road a little bit.
Bruce
-
I prefer the original stripe. Down the road a piece... Chuck Berry?
Rob C
-
C'mon, Bruce, it's Rhine II, but with an interesting background. The river needs to stay in.
-
OK, stripes, but because the Rhine bisects the flat land between us and the hill, it resonates in that space more than it does beyond. Alternately, I suggest more foreground.
Bruce
-
OK, stripes, but because the Rhine bisects the flat land between us and the hill, it resonates in that space more than it does beyond. Alternately, I suggest more foreground.
Sadly, it doesn't have the commercial value of Rhine II. There's no river, in fact: it's Red Rock Canyon, Nevada. There is, however, plenty more foreground but I thought it lacked any particular interest. I was more taken by the lowering sky.
Here's the uncropped shot.
Jeremy
-
As usual, un-cropped wins by a length.
-
As usual, un-cropped wins by a length.
I'm with Russ this time.
-
Yup, uncropped and with darker skies for me.
Rob C
-
I prefer the uncropped also, feels more balanced and that foreground is not that terrible as you might think.
-
the foreground. "grounds" the image, giving the mountains and the stripes a sense of being somewhere.
-
Interesting. I've adjusted the uncropped shot a little, applying a mask in LR to the foreground to reduce both exposure and saturation a bit. Looking at it and reflecting upon it, I now agree with the consensus. It's better as I first saw it.
Live and learn. Thanks!
Jeremy