Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: sailronin on August 24, 2012, 07:20:43 pm
-
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8424/7853804682_d8823edc56_b.jpg)
M9 w/35mm Summicron
-
I must be missing something.
I stare and stare and stare (yes, I see the line of green shrubs leading from the foreground to the bright bush, the remarkable background (unremarkably lit), the white horse and the unremarkable building), but I go away not having gained anything from the experience except the nagging question: Am I missing something truly artistic or (I don't mean to be harsh) is it just a snap of a view with no redeeming qualities (a.k.a. "a sharp photo of a fuzzy concept")?
-
I think you have hit the nail on the head..."sharp photo of fuzzy concept". I was enjoying the "burning bush" and overlooked how drab the bluff is in this light.
Thank you for the comment.
Dave
-
The shot is simply not processed well (or not processed at all). Give it to, say, Peter Eastway and see how "unremarkable" it really is.
A few steps to the left at the time of capture would have reduced the empty space in the middle ground and helped achieve a more dynamic diagonal transition from foreground to background (perhaps try content-aware scaling instead?).
-
Am I missing something truly artistic...
... a dearth of truly artistic photographs ... simply beautiful and artistic - rich in detail, tones and colours.
afaict "truly artistic" doesn't mean more than I like.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/american-english/artistic?q=artistic
-
Just a few quick adjustments. I took the liberty to modify your image, I find it much easier to demo than to write a suggestion. It's a starting point.
Peter
-
I prefer Peter's modifications, but I would also get rid of the ugly building.
-
Just a few quick adjustments. I took the liberty to modify your image, I find it much easier to demo than to write a suggestion. It's a starting point.
Peter
Aaack, this is horrid! No offense, but your modifications, have "Photoshop" written all over them and have turned a gentle and pleasing (if unremarkable) image into almost a parody of the over-processing of photos that is so common today. Please, no!
-
Aaack, this is horrid! No offense, but your modifications, have "Photoshop" written all over them and have turned a gentle and pleasing (if unremarkable) image into almost a parody of the over-processing of photos that is so common today. Please, no!
Of course Aaack. That was the point! There is much that lives in every capture. Just an example, nothing more.
Peter
-
Just a few quick adjustments. I took the liberty to modify your image, I find it much easier to demo than to write a suggestion. It's a starting point.
Peter
I must admit to preferring the hues of the original photograph - these are too green and too vibrant. There is definitely something in the original scene worth photographing - perhaps the horse and the background more than the bright bush and greenery. Sometimes it's more about what we, as photographers, leave out, then what we leave in.
-
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/artistic_1?q=artistic (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/artistic_1?q=artistic)
The "relating to art" and "skillfully and attractively made" don't take us further than I like.
-
The only proper definition of "artistic" is, of course, anything that I personally like. ::)