Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Pro Business Discussion => Topic started by: luxborealis on August 10, 2012, 06:19:56 pm
-
Different strokes for different folks, but I'm curious about what style other Lu-La forum contributors use for matting. No doubt everyone signs their photographs somewhere, but does anyone consider one way to be "more correct/acceptable" than another?
-
Signing the matte results in a signed matte.
Failing to sign the print results in an unsigned print.
Succinct!
;-)
Rob C
-
For one glorious moment, I misread the title, removed one of the "t"s and wondered where the discussion would lead. Then I discovered it's about cutting cardboard.
Hey ho.
Jeremy
-
For one glorious moment, I misread the title, removed one of the "t"s and wondered where the discussion would lead. Then I discovered it's about cutting cardboard.
Hey ho.
Jeremy
Jeremy, ordinary life is matt grey.
Love is Technicolor with Velvia tendencies.
We get used to both, desensitized, and then discover it's all too late, that we are now nothing but plusses and minuses with a few numbers thrown in to relieve the monotony just enough to avoid self-cancellation.
Time heals all things by pulling the plug.
Rob C
-
Another thing to think about...
If you sign the mat and it gets damaged after it is sold, then the person who bought it has to get the mat replaced and there goes your signature.
Go ahead and sign the mat if you want but ALWAYS sign the print SOMEWHERE!
That is the only rule I consider inviolate.
Anything else is up to your personal whims.
-
Another option is the signature on the print but not visible. Regardless, as a framer I believe it is critical to always have the photo signed. Especially if you sell your work matted but not framed. If your customer takes it to a frame shop the mat may be discarded for various reasons.
Cheers,
Mark
-
Once again Framah is correct.
If you do not sign somewhere on the art itself it becomes just an open edition