Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: amolitor on May 11, 2012, 09:58:48 am
-
This is a photograph of a print, so the sky is slightly messed up. There was some glare which I edited "out" to a degree. That's what the weird more-or-less vertical streaky crap is. Anyways, this gives a fair idea of the print but is not as good as the print.
-
So why did you take a photograph of a print?
(Rather than scanning the print - better idea - or scanning the negative and re-working it in LR or whatever - even better)
John
-
Because I don't have a scanner.
-
Well, I've got a scanner which works really well sitting on the desk beside me. It's part of an Epson all-in-one printer/scanner/copier, and it cost me all of £35 in my local supermarket. What I'm saying is, cost is not an issue . . .
John
-
Looks to be a fair print - although it's very hard to tell when your looking at a photograph of a photograph :)